Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: adding sortition interval to the parameters #442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2023

Conversation

b00f
Copy link
Collaborator

@b00f b00f commented Apr 1, 2023

Description

A new parameter added for the sortition interval.

Checklist

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • [ x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • CHANGELOG is updated.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #442 (b647f74) into main (a8c6be9) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #442      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.15%   82.16%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines        6947     6952       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         5707     5712       +5     
  Misses        950      950              
  Partials      290      290              

@b00f b00f changed the title feat: adding sortition interval to the parameters fix: adding sortition interval to the parameters Apr 23, 2023
@b00f b00f enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2023 16:01
@b00f b00f merged commit 92647ba into pactus-project:main Apr 24, 2023
@b00f b00f deleted the sortition-interval branch April 24, 2023 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants