Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests-only]remove skipOnOCIS tag from moveFiles test #4291

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2020

Conversation

swoichha
Copy link
Contributor

@swoichha swoichha commented Nov 9, 2020

Description

This PR removes @skipOnOCIS tag from a scenario of moveFiles.feature test so that it passes on ocis.

Related Issue

How Has This Been Tested?

  • 🤖

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

Open tasks:

  • ...

@swoichha swoichha force-pushed the unskip-moveFiles-ocis-test branch from 718415b to 32dabcb Compare November 10, 2020 04:54
@swoichha swoichha self-assigned this Nov 10, 2020
@swoichha swoichha added Status:Needs-Review Needs review from a maintainer QA:team labels Nov 10, 2020
@swoichha swoichha force-pushed the unskip-moveFiles-ocis-test branch from 32dabcb to e5e8d7d Compare November 10, 2020 11:40
@swoichha swoichha requested a review from dpakach November 10, 2020 11:40
@swoichha swoichha force-pushed the unskip-moveFiles-ocis-test branch from e5e8d7d to d6ae7bd Compare November 10, 2020 11:51
@phil-davis phil-davis added Status:Needs-release and removed Status:Needs-Review Needs review from a maintainer labels Nov 10, 2020
@swoichha swoichha requested a review from phil-davis November 10, 2020 12:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants