Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests-only] [full-ci] removing the setresponse in given/then step in spacestus context #7447

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

KarunAtreya
Copy link
Contributor

Description

We have used setResponse() and $this->response in the Given/Then steps and some helper functions (maybe to reuse existing available methods). But storing responses from Given/Then steps and helper functions is not a good idea because it can lead to a false positive assertion in the Then steps.
So, check the use of setResponse() and $this->response in

  • Given steps
  • Then steps (Then steps can use $this->response but must prevent saving to it)
  • Helper functions

So this pr make the above changes in SpacesTusContext

Related Issue

#7082

Motivation and Context

  • To remove setResponse() and $this->response in the Given/Then steps and some helper functions
  • To avoid false positive assertions

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • locally
  • CI

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

@KarunAtreya KarunAtreya force-pushed the refactor_spacestus_context branch 2 times, most recently from 70a976f to 52eabfd Compare October 12, 2023 04:25
Copy link
Contributor

@grgprarup grgprarup left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, except for some minor fixes.

@grgprarup grgprarup requested a review from saw-jan October 12, 2023 06:13
@KarunAtreya KarunAtreya force-pushed the refactor_spacestus_context branch from 52eabfd to 19cc882 Compare October 12, 2023 06:51
@KarunAtreya KarunAtreya force-pushed the refactor_spacestus_context branch from 19cc882 to 622b8aa Compare October 12, 2023 07:03
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@saw-jan saw-jan merged commit 79a4e3d into master Oct 12, 2023
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the refactor_spacestus_context branch October 12, 2023 10:45
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2023
… spacestus context (#7447)

* refactored removing setting response in given/then steps in spacetus context

* adressing reviews
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants