Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[full-ci] chore: bump reva to v2.25.0 #10194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

[full-ci] chore: bump reva to v2.25.0 #10194

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

micbar
Copy link
Contributor

@micbar micbar commented Sep 30, 2024

Description

Enhancement: Bump reva to 2.25.0

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • test case 1:
  • test case 2:
  • ...

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

@micbar micbar mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
18 tasks
@micbar micbar enabled auto-merge September 30, 2024 21:18
@micbar micbar requested a review from kulmann September 30, 2024 21:18
Copy link

Copy link
Member

@kulmann kulmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💪

@micbar micbar merged commit d549f48 into master Oct 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@kulmann kulmann deleted the bump-reva branch October 1, 2024 04:04
ownclouders pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
[full-ci] chore: bump reva to v2.25.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants