Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[reva] locking support #25

Closed
butonic opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

[reva] locking support #25

butonic opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@butonic
Copy link
Member

butonic commented Mar 18, 2019

-> running `locks':
 0. init.................. pass
 1. begin................. pass
 2. options............... pass
 3. precond............... pass
 4. init_locks............ pass
 5. put................... pass
 6. lock_excl............. pass
 7. discover.............. pass
 8. refresh............... pass
 9. notowner_modify....... FAIL (DELETE of locked resource should fail)
10. notowner_lock......... FAIL (UNLOCK with bogus lock token)
11. owner_modify.......... FAIL (PROPPATCH on locked resouce on `/remote.php/webdav/litmus/lockme': 501 Not Implemented)
12. notowner_modify....... FAIL (DELETE of locked resource should fail)
13. notowner_lock......... FAIL (UNLOCK with bogus lock token)
14. copy.................. FAIL (could not COPY locked resource:
404 Not Found)
15. cond_put.............. SKIPPED
16. fail_cond_put......... SKIPPED
17. cond_put_with_not..... pass
18. cond_put_corrupt_token FAIL (conditional PUT with invalid lock-token should fail: 204 No Content)
19. complex_cond_put...... pass
20. unlock................ pass
21. fail_cond_put_unlocked FAIL (conditional PUT with invalid lock-token should fail: 204 No Content)
22. lock_shared........... FAIL (requested lockscope not satisfied!  got shared, wanted exclusive)
23. notowner_modify....... SKIPPED
24. notowner_lock......... SKIPPED
25. owner_modify.......... SKIPPED
26. double_sharedlock..... SKIPPED
27. notowner_modify....... SKIPPED
28. notowner_lock......... SKIPPED
29. unlock................ SKIPPED
30. prep_collection....... pass
31. lock_collection....... pass
32. owner_modify.......... FAIL (PROPPATCH on locked resouce on `/remote.php/webdav/litmus/lockcoll/lockme.txt': 501 Not Implemented)
33. notowner_modify....... FAIL (DELETE of locked resource should fail)
34. refresh............... pass
35. indirect_refresh...... pass
36. unlock................ pass
37. unmapped_lock......... WARNING: LOCK on unmapped url returned 200 not 201 (RFC4918:S7.3)
    ...................... pass (with 1 warning)
38. unlock................ pass
39. finish................ pass
-> 9 tests were skipped.
<- summary for `locks': of 31 tests run: 20 passed, 11 failed. 64.5%

needs cs3 api changes, unless we want to hack our way around it

@butonic butonic changed the title locking support reva: locking support Mar 28, 2019
@butonic butonic changed the title reva: locking support [reva] locking support Oct 1, 2019
@butonic butonic transferred this issue from owncloud-archive/nexus Oct 1, 2019
@butonic butonic added this to the Feature Complete milestone Oct 15, 2019
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2020
add documentation about the releasing process
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
Make use of the new dynamic navItems feature in phoenix
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
implement more group management endpoints
refs added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
Downstream does not require webapp anymore
refs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2020
@refs
Copy link
Member

refs commented Jan 11, 2021

move to reva?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants