Improve github action speed for docs test

[noxan]

• Use pip cache in docs test github action (reduces runtime by ~2x, from 4.5 minutes down to 2.5 minutes)

[github-actions]

40c9a90

Model Benchmark

Benchmark	Metric	main	current	diff
AirPassengers	MAE_val	15.2698	15.2698	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	RMSE_val	19.4209	19.4209	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	Loss_val	0.00195	0.00195	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	RegLoss_val	0	0	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	epoch	89	89	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	MAE	9.82902	9.82902	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	RMSE	11.7005	11.7005	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	Loss	0.00056	0.00056	0.0%	✅
AirPassengers	RegLoss	0	0	0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	MAE_val	0.64636	0.64636	-0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	RMSE_val	0.79276	0.79276	-0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	Loss_val	0.01494	0.01494	-0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	RegLoss_val	0	0	0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	epoch	37	37	0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	MAE	0.42701	0.42701	0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	RMSE	0.57032	0.57032	-0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	Loss	0.00635	0.00635	0.0%	✅
PeytonManning	RegLoss	0	0	0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	MAE_val	1.72949	1.72948	-0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	RMSE_val	2.27386	2.27386	-0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	Loss_val	0.00096	0.00096	-0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	RegLoss_val	0	0	0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	epoch	84	84	0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	MAE	1.45189	1.45189	-0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	RMSE	2.16631	2.16631	-0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	Loss	0.00066	0.00066	0.0%	✅
YosemiteTemps	RegLoss	0	0	0.0%	✅

Model Training

PeytonManning

YosemiteTemps

AirPassengers

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #936 (40c9a90) into main (cce32c0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #936   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.41%   87.41%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        4464     4464           
=======================================
  Hits         3902     3902           
  Misses        562      562           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[karl-richter]

Really good idea! Can we also add this to the other tests that use the pip requirements file? eg. the metrics.yml test.

[noxan]

@karl-richter yes, we could, I'd also support the idea. happy to follow up on this, might make sense to fix our dependency versions along that task.

[Kevin-Chen0]

Is this for version 0.5.0?

[karl-richter]

lgtm