Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle ctrl+map click packet (GM teleport) #4239

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Nov 9, 2022
Merged

Conversation

MillhioreBT
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request Prelude

  • I have followed [proper The Forgotten Server code styling][code].
  • I have read and understood the [contribution guidelines][cont] before making this PR.
  • I am aware that this PR may be closed if the above-mentioned criteria are not fulfilled.

Changes Proposed

MapClick!

Issues addressed: Nothing!

@ghost ghost requested review from ranisalt, DSpeichert, nekiro and ramon-bernardo November 7, 2022 05:53
Copy link
Contributor

@ramon-bernardo ramon-bernardo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not? 🆗

@ranisalt
Copy link
Member

ranisalt commented Nov 8, 2022

Cool. Would be a perfect packet for handling in Lua 😭

@ranisalt ranisalt changed the title MapClick Handle ctrl+map click packet (GM teleport) Nov 8, 2022
@ghost ghost merged commit b35bd82 into otland:master Nov 9, 2022
@Erza
Copy link
Contributor

Erza commented Nov 14, 2022

Cool. Would be a perfect packet for handling in Lua 😭

Do you have a system in mind for forwarding packets to be handled in Lua? The issue there would be that it has to go across 2 threads, potentially needing a copy of the packet

@ranisalt
Copy link
Member

ranisalt commented Dec 6, 2022

Do you have a system in mind for forwarding packets to be handled in Lua? The issue there would be that it has to go across 2 threads, potentially needing a copy of the packet

That is why I kept the copy in #4043

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants