Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[merged] tests: Alias assert_not_reached() -> fatal() #648

Closed

Conversation

cgwalters
Copy link
Member

We had a lot of copies of the "echo something 1>&2; exit 1" code even though
assert_not_reached() was it. Hence, I think we need a shorter alias for that.

Doing this particularly since I noticed a missing 1 in an exit 1 call in the
rpm-ostree copy of this.

We had a lot of copies of the "echo something 1>&2; exit 1" code even though
`assert_not_reached()` was it.  Hence, I think we need a shorter alias for that.

Doing this particularly since I noticed a missing `1` in an `exit 1` call in the
rpm-ostree copy of this.
@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Jan 18, 2017

Boy, even Travis is happy for a change!
@rh-atomic-bot r+ e643560

@rh-atomic-bot
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit e643560 with merge 2f71136...

@rh-atomic-bot
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-atomicjenkins
Approved by: jlebon
Pushing 2f71136 to master...

@rh-atomic-bot rh-atomic-bot changed the title tests: Alias assert_not_reached() -> fatal() [merged] tests: Alias assert_not_reached() -> fatal() Jan 18, 2017
cgwalters added a commit to cgwalters/ostree that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2017
We had a lot of copies of the "echo something 1>&2; exit 1" code even though
`assert_not_reached()` was it.  Hence, I think we need a shorter alias for that.

Doing this particularly since I noticed a missing `1` in an `exit 1` call in the
rpm-ostree copy of this.

Closes: ostreedev#648
Approved by: jlebon
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants