lib/deploy: Round to block size in early prune space check #3130
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When we estimate how much space a new bootcsum dir will use, we
weren't accounting for the space overhead from files not using the
last filesystem block completely. This doesn't matter much if counting
a few files, but e.g. on FCOS aarch64, we include lots of small
devicetree blobs in the bootfs. That loss can add up to enough for the
fallocate()
check to pass but copying still hittingENOSPC
later on.I think a better fix here is to change approach entirely and instead
refactor
install_deployment_kernel()
so that we can call just thecopying bits of it as part of the early prune logic. We'll get a more
accurate assessment and it's not lost work since we won't need to
recopy later on. Also this would not require having to keep in sync the
estimator and the install bits.
That said, this is blocking FCOS releases, so I went with a more tactical
fix for now.
Fixes: coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker#1637