Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial fs-verity support #1959
Initial fs-verity support #1959
Changes from all commits
58fa579
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Won't this cause one
ioctl
each time even if it's not supported? Hmm, how about we add an optionalfsverity_wanted
parameter to_ostree_tmpf_fsverity
that overrides the one fromOstreeRepo
? Then we could use it here too and get the automatic no-op.Ohh, but right the kernel might support it, but not the filesystem on
/boot
. Hmm, so probably instead we should have aboot_fsverity
in theOstreeSysroot
object? But ehhh, this is good as is too. The number of files we install in/boot
pales in comparison to/
so it's a small optimization we could do later.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, an extra syscall or two for this doesn't matter much, but I try to keep the total small since I sometimes just resort to
strace -f
- we have a lot more objects than kernels.