Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: assignment value makes no sense #8871

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DongLieu
Copy link
Contributor

@DongLieu DongLieu commented Dec 6, 2024

Closes: #XXX

What is the purpose of the change

Add a description of the overall background and high level changes that this PR introduces

(E.g.: This pull request improves documentation of area A by adding ....

Testing and Verifying

(Please pick one of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added unit test that validates ...
  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with ...
  • Extended integration test for ...
  • Manually verified the change by ...

Documentation and Release Note

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature or user-facing behavior changes?
  • Changelog entry added to Unreleased section of CHANGELOG.md?

Where is the change documented?

  • Specification (x/{module}/README.md)
  • Osmosis documentation site
  • Code comments?
  • N/A

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to two files: genesis.go and root.go. In genesis.go, the iteration method for setting the StartTime of epochs in the GenesisParams structure is modified for clarity and potential performance improvements. In root.go, several updates are made to asset management and configuration handling, including refined error handling, streamlined logic for loading asset lists, and updates to method signatures and command definitions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
cmd/osmosisd/cmd/genesis.go Modified PrepareGenesisCmd and TestnetGenesisParams for setting epoch StartTime using index-based iteration. No changes to parameters or return types.
cmd/osmosisd/cmd/root.go Removed codec import; updated createOsmosisAppAndExport, loadAssetList, overwriteConfigTomlValues, and overwriteAppTomlValues for improved error handling and logic; added UpdateAssetListCmd.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

A:no-changelog, V:state/compatible/no_backport

Suggested reviewers

  • PaddyMc
  • ValarDragon

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a181bf and f7d3ca8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cmd/osmosisd/cmd/genesis.go (2 hunks)
  • cmd/osmosisd/cmd/root.go (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • cmd/osmosisd/cmd/root.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/osmosisd/cmd/genesis.go (2)

480-481: Improved slice modification using index-based iteration

The change to use index-based iteration is correct as it allows direct modification of the slice elements. The previous implementation likely used a range variable which would create a copy, preventing modifications to the original slice.


529-530: LGTM - Consistent with mainnet implementation

The same iteration pattern is correctly applied to the testnet configuration, maintaining consistency with the mainnet implementation.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@PaddyMc PaddyMc closed this Dec 10, 2024
@PaddyMc PaddyMc reopened this Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants