-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 613
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update record sanity check #2741
Merged
Merged
Changes from 21 commits
Commits
Show all changes
27 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
29539a1
add new error type
hieuvubk 7b87cd8
add condition to ensure ctx time > record time
hieuvubk 0cbfc04
format
hieuvubk b09e65f
replace
hieuvubk dfc2307
fix unused import
hieuvubk cd78749
update co conditions, bypass the case when creating pool
hieuvubk 5e9e64b
add cmt
hieuvubk a7b94af
resolved conflict
hieuvubk 17618aa
Merge branch 'main' into update_record_sanity_check
hieuvubk 5c3e98a
update test for checking block height
hieuvubk f7fcdc3
format
hieuvubk c43885d
Merge branch 'main' into update_record_sanity_check
hieuvubk acf03e3
Merge branch 'main' into update_record_sanity_check
hieuvubk 0409367
update err message
hieuvubk 77502d9
Merge branch 'main' into update_record_sanity_check
alexanderbez fa28336
Merge branch 'main' into update_record_sanity_check
mattverse 95713c2
Merge branch 'main' into update_record_sanity_check
hieuvubk 24da39c
update ctx & err
hieuvubk ad6bd30
Merge branch 'update_record_sanity_check' of https://github.com/osmos…
hieuvubk 71991e9
rebase
hieuvubk bc79f48
resolve conflict
hieuvubk c6f1b8f
split condition
hieuvubk 277d7a7
update condition & add more test
hieuvubk 2f5103d
lint
hieuvubk 6574fa6
update return err
hieuvubk a00dbcf
update changelog
hieuvubk d9f3a6a
merge main
hieuvubk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it not
>
but>=
? Can the record not have same height as blockheight by design?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its a case when creating new pool. New twap records will be created and updated immediately. I limit this by adding the condition
ArithmeticTwapAccumulator
must be zero (init twap record). But I should split it upThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sweet, can we add this context as inline comment?