fix: module whitelist settings parse #572
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update enhances the server's configuration capabilities by improving module management. It introduces a new variable for whitelisting node modules in the default application options and adds a function to parse this whitelist from the application's options. These changes boost flexibility and security in module usage within the server environment. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- server/util.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
server/util.go (1)
- 483-490: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [486-500]
The initialization of
fastNodeModuleWhitelistusingParseModuleWhitelist(appOpts)and its subsequent use inbaseapp.SetIAVLFastNodeModuleWhitelist(fastNodeModuleWhitelist)is a clear and direct approach to enhancing the module whitelist settings parsing mechanism. This change effectively integrates the new parsing logic into the existing configuration setup, ensuring that the whitelist settings are correctly applied to the IAVL fast node configuration.
| func ParseModuleWhitelist(appOpts types.AppOptions) []string { | ||
| var whitelist []string | ||
| if wl, ok := appOpts.Get(FlagIAVLFastNodeModuleWhitelist).([]string); ok { | ||
| // Trim the brackets from the string | ||
| trimmed := strings.Trim(wl[0], "[]") | ||
| // If the trimmed string is not empty, split it into a slice of strings | ||
| if trimmed != "" { | ||
| // Split the string into a slice of strings using space and comma as the separators | ||
| whitelist = strings.FieldsFunc(trimmed, func(c rune) bool { | ||
| return c == ' ' || c == ',' | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| whitelist = cast.ToStringSlice(appOpts.Get(FlagIAVLFastNodeModuleWhitelist)) | ||
| } | ||
| return whitelist | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ParseModuleWhitelist function introduces a robust mechanism for parsing the module whitelist settings from AppOptions. It correctly handles both slice and string types for the FlagIAVLFastNodeModuleWhitelist option, ensuring flexibility in configuration. However, there are a few points to consider for refinement:
- Error Handling: The function lacks error handling or feedback mechanisms for cases where the parsing fails or the input format is unexpected. Adding error handling or logging could improve debuggability and user experience.
- Code Duplication: The trimming and splitting logic (lines 533-539) could be encapsulated into a helper function if similar parsing patterns are used elsewhere in the codebase, promoting code reuse and maintainability.
- Performance Consideration: While not critical for this specific use case, for larger lists or more frequent calls, optimizing the parsing logic (e.g., reducing string manipulations) could be beneficial.
Consider adding error handling or logging to provide feedback on parsing failures or unexpected input formats. Additionally, evaluate the potential for code reuse and performance optimizations in the parsing logic.
* fix how we parse module whitelist * changelog update (cherry picked from commit cf09bb5) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
* fix how we parse module whitelist * changelog update (cherry picked from commit cf09bb5) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 10
CHANGELOG.md (10)
- 50-53: The entry for the fix in version
v0.47.5-v23-osmo-5-iavl-v1andv0.47.5-v23-osmo-4regarding module whitelist parsing is clear and concise. However, it would be beneficial to include a brief description of how the parsing issue was resolved or what the impact of the fix is, to provide more context to the reader.- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [98-98]
The version
v0.47.5entry mentions the addition ofQueryEventForTxCmdcommand. It's good practice to briefly describe the purpose or functionality of new features for clarity. Consider adding a short description.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [106-106]
In the entry for version
v0.47.5, the improvement regarding theMigrateHandlerfunction could be enhanced by specifying the benefits or use cases of this addition, making it more informative for the reader.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [112-112]
The entry under version
v0.47.5about combining depinject-enabled and non-depinject-enabled modules in app v2 could be rephrased for clarity. Consider simplifying the language to make it more accessible to readers unfamiliar with these terms.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [115-115]
The entry mentioning the
draft-proposalcommand under versionv0.47.5bug fixes could benefit from a brief explanation of the issue that was fixed, providing more context to the reader.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [160-160]
The entry for version
v0.47.3about adding aClosemethod toBaseAppis concise. However, mentioning the scenarios or benefits of using this method could enhance the reader's understanding.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [227-228]
The entry under version
v0.47.5about addingFormatIntandFormatDecfunctions in themathpackage is informative. It would be helpful to include examples of how these functions can be used, to illustrate their utility.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [240-240]
The entry discussing the creation of the
x/consensusmodule in versionv0.47.5is significant. Expanding on how this change affects developers or the migration process fromx/paramswould provide valuable insights.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [266-266]
In the entry for version
v0.47.5-v23-osmo-5-iavl-v1, the mention of addingiavl-lazy-loadingconfiguration could be enhanced by briefly explaining the performance implications or scenarios where this feature is particularly beneficial.
- 47-56: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [429-429]
The entry under version
v0.47.5about fixing snapshot checksum issues in Golang 1.19 is crucial. Providing a bit more detail on the nature of the checksum issue and its impact could help readers understand the importance of this fix.
* fix: module whitelist settings parse (#572) * fix how we parse module whitelist * changelog update (cherry picked from commit cf09bb5) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md * merge conflict --------- Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
* fix: module whitelist settings parse (#572) * fix how we parse module whitelist * changelog update (cherry picked from commit cf09bb5) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md * merge conflict --------- Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
* fix how we parse module whitelist * changelog update
Description
Closes: #XXXX
There is some really strange bug with appOpts.Get for string slices. I spent hours trying to figure out the root cause, but was unable to. Basically, it sets the result as an array of length 1, no mater how it is formated, along with adding an extra set of square brackets around the result.
So ["lockup"] becomes [lockup], ["lockup", "superfluid"] becomes [lockup superfluid], etc.
This just adds separate logic to get around this problem.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeSummary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features