forked from cometbft/cometbft
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf(event bus): Remove expensive Logger debug call in PublishEventTx… #38
Merged
czarcas7ic
merged 1 commit into
osmo/v0.37.4
from
adam/remove_expensive_logger_with_call
May 2, 2024
Merged
perf(event bus): Remove expensive Logger debug call in PublishEventTx… #38
czarcas7ic
merged 1 commit into
osmo/v0.37.4
from
adam/remove_expensive_logger_with_call
May 2, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]>
czarcas7ic
added
S:backport/v24
backport to the osmo-v24/v0.37.4 branch
S:backport/v25
backport to the osmo-v25/v0.37.4 branch
labels
May 2, 2024
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd)
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd)
This was referenced May 2, 2024
czarcas7ic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) (#44) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd) Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
czarcas7ic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937) (#38) (#45) Component of cometbft#2869 This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now. I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these. --- #### PR checklist - [x] Tests written/updated - Covered by existing tests - [x] Changelog entry added in `.changelog` (we use [unclog](https://github.com/informalsystems/unclog) to manage our changelog) - [X] Updated relevant documentation (`docs/` or `spec/`) and code comments - [X] Title follows the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/) spec <hr>This is an automatic backport of pull request cometbft#2911 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). --------- Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dev Ojha <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Andy Nogueira <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit a9991fd) Co-authored-by: Adam Tucker <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S:backport/v24
backport to the osmo-v24/v0.37.4 branch
S:backport/v25
backport to the osmo-v25/v0.37.4 branch
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… (backport cometbft#2911) (cometbft#2937)
Component of cometbft#2869
This on its own is an expected 1% speedup to blocksync on osmosis mainnet right now.
I originally considered keeping the log lines but with only creating the logger cost if there is an error, but these are debug logs I've never seen. I think its better to just remove these debug logs directly, rather than worry about maintaining them. These aren't even that concerning scenarios I feel like, as more of the stack moves away from these.
PR checklist
.changelog
(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/
orspec/
) and code commentsThis is an automatic backport of pull request perf(event bus): Remove expensive Logger debug call in PublishEventTx cometbft/cometbft#2911 done by Mergify.
PR checklist
.changelog
(we use unclog to manage our changelog)docs/
orspec/
) and code comments