Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed error in random_rothe_matrix #4407

Closed

Conversation

flenzen
Copy link
Collaborator

@flenzen flenzen commented Dec 17, 2024

Code using random_rothe_matrix would fail. Additionally, split function into separate function for finite/infinite case. @antonydellavecchia

Split `random_rothe_matrix` into two functions for FqField and QQField
case
@flenzen flenzen marked this pull request as draft December 17, 2024 15:48
@lgoettgens lgoettgens added the experimental Only changes experimental parts of the code label Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (adv/alg-shifting-lv@f33985a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
experimental/AlgebraicShifting/src/PartialShift.jl 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##             adv/alg-shifting-lv    #4407   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                       ?   84.31%           
======================================================
  Files                          ?      656           
  Lines                          ?    87262           
  Branches                       ?        0           
======================================================
  Hits                           ?    73574           
  Misses                         ?    13688           
  Partials                       ?        0           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
experimental/AlgebraicShifting/src/PartialShift.jl 62.63% <0.00%> (ø)

@antonydellavecchia
Copy link
Collaborator

mix up with branches, closing as no longer relevant

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
experimental Only changes experimental parts of the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants