-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for advanced partitioning customizations (COMPOSER-2399) #4535
Open
achilleas-k
wants to merge
7
commits into
osbuild:main
Choose a base branch
from
achilleas-k:all-the-partitioning-all-the-time
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+900
−19
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f928ce8
blueprint: add local DiskCustomization
achilleas-k edf99d8
blueprint: test the conversion
achilleas-k 010c6fe
test/filesystem: move blueprint writing to function
achilleas-k 4c09586
test/filesystem: remove conditions on v94
achilleas-k 262602d
test/filesystem: support various layouts
achilleas-k 2ca9c3f
test/filessystem: minor cleanups
achilleas-k 423fb63
gitlab: run all versions of filesystem.sh
achilleas-k File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a very stupid (sorry!) question - could we simply do:
here (and remove disk_customizations.go in this PR)?
And then we would add a "Validate()" that simply disallows the "dc.Type" (as it seems that is the only thing we do not support compared to the images disk_blueprint)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think with the work we're doing to unify blueprints, it might be a good idea to just drop the whole copy from here and make it use the one from images directly.