-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
many: move machine id first boot to image config #1258
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Yes, this is the correct approach from my point of view, but I've added a few comments.
585d2be
to
6a1cee1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Small docstring comment but wont block.
9bb5af2
to
e379461
Compare
e379461
to
1e06711
Compare
Several of the IoT images are failing due to:
I've addressed this in a new commit (I hope). And also addressed @achilleas-k's comment on the comment(s) since I was force pushing anyhow. |
35bf37e
to
5d6086c
Compare
This seems to finally be OK but I think it rebuilt images that I didn't expect to be rebuilt? |
840bf01
to
38610da
Compare
Cool, all good now :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
This moves the machine id handling from specific to Fedora to the image config. Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
Don't turn off the regeneration of the machine id for the iot image types, it breaks in rpm-ostree. Signed-off-by: Simon de Vlieger <[email protected]>
38610da
to
dac855f
Compare
Force pushed to resolve conflicts. |
This moves the machine id handling from specific to Fedora to the image config.
Had a chat with @achilleas-k and @thozza today who pointed out that they'd prefer this to live in the image config. Is this the right approach?