Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redirect f2c to correct call #2473

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2020
Merged

Conversation

williamfgc
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses #2472 @pnorbert looks like a terrible oversight from my side, the Fortran bindings need more testing on the read side.

@williamfgc williamfgc requested a review from pnorbert September 29, 2020 17:13
@pnorbert
Copy link
Contributor

I am playing with the example provided in #2472 and there is a test for it, Bindings.Fortran.BPWriteTypes.Serial`
However, the example fails on that test's output (0 steps), while the test itself passes (3 steps)
So this PR will fix that?

@pnorbert
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, it fixes it. Thanks.

@pnorbert
Copy link
Contributor

Ahh, the test just prints the nsteps if it is not correct, but does not fail.

@pnorbert
Copy link
Contributor

adios2/bindings/fortran/TestBPWriteTypes.F90: 234
Can you fix the test as well for this PR?

@williamfgc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pnorbert great catch. Now, I'm wondering what exactly I was trying to do :)

@pnorbert pnorbert merged commit 7cd3a84 into ornladios:master Sep 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants