GitHub Community
GRPC vs REST #145357
-
Select Topic AreaQuestion BodyWhich is better GRPC or REST? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
gRPC is generally faster and more efficient than REST due to its use of HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers, making it ideal for high-performance, low-latency microservices. It supports bidirectional streaming, allowing real-time data flow, which REST lacks. However, REST is easier to implement and is widely compatible with browsers and web applications, using JSON for human-readable responses. REST’s simplicity and extensive tooling make it a popular choice for public-facing APIs and simpler applications. In short, gRPC is better for high-performance, internal microservices, while REST is preferred for web-facing APIs that prioritize ease of use and compatibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
gRPC is generally faster and more efficient than REST due to its use of HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers, making it ideal for high-performance, low-latency microservices. It supports bidirectional streaming, allowing real-time data flow, which REST lacks. However, REST is easier to implement and is widely compatible with browsers and web applications, using JSON for human-readable responses. REST’s simplicity and extensive tooling make it a popular choice for public-facing APIs and simpler applications. In short, gRPC is better for high-performance, internal microservices, while REST is preferred for web-facing APIs that prioritize ease of use and compatibility.