fix(cp): avoid showing empty descriptor in progress bar

[qweeah]

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR fixes progress ratio and missing descriptor in the progress output.

Before

> oras cp --to-oci-layout jinzha1.azurecr.io/test:blank-progress .
✓ Copied  application/vnd.docker.container.image.v1+json                                                              0/0  B 100.00%    9ms
  └─ sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
⠋ [....................](   0  B/s) Copying application/vnd.docker.image.rootfs.diff.tar.gzip                      0.00/0  B   0.00%   26ms
  └─ sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
✓ Copied  application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json                                                  6.16/6.16 kB 100.00%   19ms
  └─ sha256:47506275bd97c02cd5f2c8c86d67d1faf8d3816ba0278aae63fb9cd25ec02e6c
Copied [registry] jinzha1.azurecr.io/test:blank-progress => [oci-layout] .
Digest: sha256:47506275bd97c02cd5f2c8c86d67d1faf8d3816ba0278aae63fb9cd25ec02e6c

After

> oras cp --to-oci-layout jinzha1.azurecr.io/test:blank-progress ./debug
✓ Copied  application/vnd.docker.image.rootfs.diff.tar.gzip                                                                                                0/0  B 100.00%    1ms
  └─ sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
✓ Copied  application/vnd.docker.container.image.v1+json                                                                                                   0/0  B 100.00%     0s
  └─ sha256:e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
✓ Copied  application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json                                                                                       6.16/6.16 kB 100.00%  808µs
  └─ sha256:47506275bd97c02cd5f2c8c86d67d1faf8d3816ba0278aae63fb9cd25ec02e6c
Copied [registry] jinzha1.azurecr.io/test:blank-progress => [oci-layout] ./debug
Digest: sha256:47506275bd97c02cd5f2c8c86d67d1faf8d3816ba0278aae63fb9cd25ec02e6c

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #1442

Please check the following list:

• Does the affected code have corresponding tests, e.g. unit test, E2E test?
• Does this change require a documentation update?
• Does this introduce breaking changes that would require an announcement or bumping the major version?
• Do all new files have an appropriate license header?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.99%. Comparing base (b8db531) to head (793acd1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1528      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.87%   83.99%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines        5166     5174       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         4333     4346      +13     
+ Misses        592      588       -4     
+ Partials      241      240       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[TerryHowe]

/lgtm

[shizhMSFT]

LGTM

[TerryHowe]

/lgtm