Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Isolate progress channel in Messenger #1447

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

TerryHowe
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Isolate details about the progress channel from users

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.30769% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.42%. Comparing base (cdb60fc) to head (769aeb2).

Files Patch % Lines
...oras/internal/display/status/progress/messenger.go 88.88% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1447      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.47%   85.42%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         108      109       +1     
  Lines        3827     3841      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         3271     3281      +10     
- Misses        333      336       +3     
- Partials      223      224       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TerryHowe TerryHowe changed the title refactor: Isolate progress channel in StatusManager refactor: Isolate progress channel in Messenger Jul 18, 2024
@qweeah
Copy link
Contributor

qweeah commented Jul 19, 2024

BTW @TerryHowe Good job, this is an elegant refactoring!

Copy link
Contributor

@qweeah qweeah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@qweeah qweeah merged commit 3d6e3f4 into oras-project:main Jul 23, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants