Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow E2E to skip multiple tests #2892

Merged

Conversation

awgreene
Copy link
Member

Problem: There are instances where a user may wish to skip multiple e2e tests.

Solution: Allow users to specify multple tests to skip in the e2e suite by setting multiple test names separated by the semicolon (;) symbol.`

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene [email protected]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2022

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 11, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 11, 2022
Problem: There are instances where a user may wish to skip multiple
e2e tests.

Solution: Allow users to specify multple tests to skip in the e2e
suite by setting multiple test names separated by the semicolon (;)
symbol.`

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>
@awgreene awgreene marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2022 13:42
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from benluddy and njhale November 11, 2022 13:42
@dtfranz
Copy link
Contributor

dtfranz commented Nov 11, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6cfd86c into operator-framework:master Nov 11, 2022
awgreene added a commit to awgreene/operator-lifecycle-manager that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2022
awgreene added a commit to awgreene/operator-lifecycle-manager that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2022
awgreene added a commit to awgreene/operator-lifecycle-manager that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2022
This reverts commit 6cfd86c, which is
not necessary because the ginkgo run --skip flag supports regex.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>
openshift-merge-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2022
This reverts commit 6cfd86c, which is
not necessary because the ginkgo run --skip flag supports regex.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants