Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump RukPak Dependency #506

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

awgreene
Copy link
Member

@awgreene awgreene commented Nov 2, 2023

No description provided.

@awgreene awgreene requested a review from a team as a code owner November 2, 2023 17:16
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 2, 2023
Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <[email protected]>
@awgreene awgreene force-pushed the bump-rukpak-dependency branch from acc2699 to 6b5ccc9 Compare November 2, 2023 17:18
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 2, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9c7291d) 83.92% compared to head (6b5ccc9) 83.92%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #506   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.92%   83.92%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines         877      877           
=======================================
  Hits          736      736           
  Misses         96       96           
  Partials       45       45           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 65.45% <ø> (ø)
unit 78.68% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ankitathomas ankitathomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 2, 2023
@awgreene awgreene added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 2, 2023
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 9081f96 Nov 2, 2023
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants