Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ZTS: Written props test fails with 4k disks #9477

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2019
Merged

ZTS: Written props test fails with 4k disks #9477

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2019

Conversation

jwk404
Copy link
Contributor

@jwk404 jwk404 commented Oct 17, 2019

With 4k disks, this test will fail in the last section because the
expected human readable value of 20.0M is reported as 20.1M. Rather than
use the human readable property, switch to the parsable property and
verify that the values are reasonably close.

Motivation and Context

This change fixes a test that's broken with 4k disks.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested with 4k disks on azure and gcp as well as older disks on vmware, and finally with loop devices.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

With 4k disks, this test will fail in the last section because the
expected human readable value of 20.0M is reported as 20.1M. Rather than
use the human readable property, switch to the parsable property and
verify that the values are reasonably close.

Signed-off-by: John Kennedy <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #9477 into master will decrease coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9477      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.28%   79.12%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         415      415              
  Lines      123632   123632              
==========================================
- Hits        98019    97820     -199     
- Misses      25613    25812     +199
Flag Coverage Δ
#kernel 79.72% <ø> (-0.07%) ⬇️
#user 66.91% <ø> (-0.39%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4313a5b...b94488b. Read the comment docs.

@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) label Oct 18, 2019
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 4063440 into openzfs:master Oct 18, 2019
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2019
With 4k disks, this test will fail in the last section because the
expected human readable value of 20.0M is reported as 20.1M. Rather than
use the human readable property, switch to the parsable property and
verify that the values are reasonably close.

Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Kennedy <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9477
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2019
With 4k disks, this test will fail in the last section because the
expected human readable value of 20.0M is reported as 20.1M. Rather than
use the human readable property, switch to the parsable property and
verify that the values are reasonably close.

Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Kennedy <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9477
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
With 4k disks, this test will fail in the last section because the
expected human readable value of 20.0M is reported as 20.1M. Rather than
use the human readable property, switch to the parsable property and
verify that the values are reasonably close.

Reviewed-by: Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Kennedy <[email protected]>
Closes #9477
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants