Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

9151 fix panic on DilOS with kstat per dataset statistics #9254

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2019

Conversation

ikozhukhov
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Igor Kozhukhov [email protected]

fix issue #9151

Motivation and Context

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Aug 29, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@behlendorf behlendorf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This value is ignored in the Linux kstat code, but it seems like a reasonable approach to resolve the issue for other platforms.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #9254 into master will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9254      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.08%   79.05%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         400      400              
  Lines      122034   122035       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        96516    96479      -37     
- Misses      25518    25556      +38
Flag Coverage Δ
#kernel 79.63% <100%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
#user 67.03% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f66ad58...9ade6cf. Read the comment docs.

@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Sep 3, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@sdimitro sdimitro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you Igor!

@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit e242b67 into openzfs:master Sep 3, 2019
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2019
Account for ZFS_MAX_DATASET_NAME_LEN in kstat data size.  This value
is ignored in the Linux kstat code but resolves the issue for other
platforms.

Reviewed-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9254
Closes openzfs#9151
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2019
Account for ZFS_MAX_DATASET_NAME_LEN in kstat data size.  This value
is ignored in the Linux kstat code but resolves the issue for other
platforms.

Reviewed-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9254
Closes openzfs#9151
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
Account for ZFS_MAX_DATASET_NAME_LEN in kstat data size.  This value
is ignored in the Linux kstat code but resolves the issue for other
platforms.

Reviewed-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]>
Closes #9254
Closes #9151
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants