Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop redundant POSIX ACL check in zpl_init_acl() #9009

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2019

Conversation

kusumi
Copy link
Member

@kusumi kusumi commented Jul 9, 2019

Motivation and Context

Description

ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Jul 9, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #9009 into master will increase coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is 50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9009      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    78.5%   78.69%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         401      401              
  Lines      120145   120145              
==========================================
+ Hits        94322    94547     +225     
+ Misses      25823    25598     -225
Flag Coverage Δ
#kernel 79.5% <50%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
#user 66.26% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1d20b76...fa8b0f4. Read the comment docs.

@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Jul 15, 2019
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 6993e01 into openzfs:master Jul 15, 2019
TulsiJain pushed a commit to TulsiJain/zfs that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
TulsiJain pushed a commit to TulsiJain/zfs that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#9009
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
ZFS_ACLTYPE_POSIXACL has already been tested in zpl_init_acl(),
so no need to test again on POSIX ACL access.

Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <[email protected]>
Closes #9009
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants