-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix get_zfs_sb race and misc fixes #4828
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3e783da
Don't allow accessing XATTR via export handle
69bc382
Fix Large kmem_alloc in vdev_metaslab_init
81c1aff
Add configure result for xattr_handler
e6aecb7
fh_to_dentry should return ESTALE when generation mismatch
761861c
Fix get_zfs_sb race with concurrent umount
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1393,9 +1393,9 @@ get_zfs_sb(const char *dsname, zfs_sb_t **zsbp) | |
|
||
mutex_enter(&os->os_user_ptr_lock); | ||
*zsbp = dmu_objset_get_user(os); | ||
if (*zsbp && (*zsbp)->z_sb) { | ||
atomic_inc(&((*zsbp)->z_sb->s_active)); | ||
} else { | ||
/* bump s_active only when non-zero to prevent umount race */ | ||
if (*zsbp == NULL || (*zsbp)->z_sb == NULL || | ||
!atomic_inc_not_zero(&((*zsbp)->z_sb->s_active))) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The fix here looks good but let's structure it as a
|
||
error = SET_ERROR(ESRCH); | ||
} | ||
mutex_exit(&os->os_user_ptr_lock); | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the associated
kmem_free
for this also be changed tovmem_free
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you're right. I probably didn't do that because it happens to be the same under the hood. But there's no guarantee it won't change.