Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the BTI elf note to the AArch64 SHA2 assembly #16086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

zxombie
Copy link
Contributor

@zxombie zxombie commented Apr 12, 2024

Motivation and Context

On ELF platforms there is a note to specify when an application or library supports BTI. When linking one of these the linker needs all input object files to have the note. If not it will not include it in the output file.

Normally the compiler would generate it, but for assembly files we need to do it our selves.

Description

Add the note to the aarch64 sha256 and sha512 assembly files.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested by building with BTI enabled and using the -zbti-report=error flag to lld that makes it an error if the note is missing.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

On ELF platforms there is a note to specify when an application or
library supports BTI. When linking one of these the linker needs
all input object files to have the note. If not it will not include
it in the output file.

Normally the compiler would generate it, but for assembly files we
need to do it our selves.

Add the note to the aarch64 sha256 and sha512 assembly files.

Tested by building with BTI enabled and using the -zbti-report=error
flag to lld that makes it an error if the note is missing.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Turner <[email protected]>
@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Apr 12, 2024
@mcmilk
Copy link
Contributor

mcmilk commented Apr 14, 2024

@zxombie - could you maybe review this: #15784 ?
Maybe you have another or cleaner solution to this?

@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit c6da985 into openzfs:master Apr 15, 2024
25 checks passed
@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Apr 15, 2024
tonyhutter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
On ELF platforms there is a note to specify when an application or
library supports BTI. When linking one of these the linker needs
all input object files to have the note. If not it will not include
it in the output file.

Normally the compiler would generate it, but for assembly files we
need to do it our selves.

Add the note to the aarch64 sha256 and sha512 assembly files.

Tested by building with BTI enabled and using the -zbti-report=error
flag to lld that makes it an error if the note is missing.

Reviewed-by: Tino Reichardt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Turner <[email protected]>
Closes #16086
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
On ELF platforms there is a note to specify when an application or
library supports BTI. When linking one of these the linker needs
all input object files to have the note. If not it will not include
it in the output file.

Normally the compiler would generate it, but for assembly files we
need to do it our selves.

Add the note to the aarch64 sha256 and sha512 assembly files.

Tested by building with BTI enabled and using the -zbti-report=error
flag to lld that makes it an error if the note is missing.

Reviewed-by: Tino Reichardt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Turner <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#16086
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants