vdev_disk: clean up spa/bdev mode conversion #15995
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
robn
force-pushed
the
vdev-disk-mode-cleanup
branch
from
0f2c4a0 to
2f021cf
Compare
robn
changed the title
allanjude
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
behlendorf
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2024
43e8f6e introduced a subtle API misuse, in that it passed the output from vdev_bdev_mode() back into itself. Fortunately, the SPA_MODE_(READ|WRITE) bit values exactly map to the FMODE_(READ|WRITE) & BLK_OPEN_(READ|WRITE) bit values, so it didn't result in a bug, but it was hard to read and understand, so I cleaned it up. In doing so, I noticed that the only call to vdev_bdev_mode() without the "exclusive" flag set was in that misuse, and actually, we never do a non-exclusive blkdev_get_by_path(). So I've just made exclusive be always-on. Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]> Sponsored-by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored-by: Wasabi Technology, Inc.
robn
force-pushed
the
vdev-disk-mode-cleanup
branch
from
2f021cf to
2cda659
Compare
Done. If the tests look good, then we're good. Cheers. |
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
43e8f6e introduced a subtle API misuse, in that it passed the output from vdev_bdev_mode() back into itself. Fortunately, the SPA_MODE_(READ|WRITE) bit values exactly map to the FMODE_(READ|WRITE) & BLK_OPEN_(READ|WRITE) bit values, so it didn't result in a bug, but it was hard to read and understand, so I cleaned it up. In doing so, I noticed that the only call to vdev_bdev_mode() without the "exclusive" flag set was in that misuse, and actually, we never do a non-exclusive blkdev_get_by_path(). So I've just made exclusive be always-on. Sponsored-by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored-by: Wasabi Technology, Inc. Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]> Closes #15995
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2024
43e8f6e introduced a subtle API misuse, in that it passed the output from vdev_bdev_mode() back into itself. Fortunately, the SPA_MODE_(READ|WRITE) bit values exactly map to the FMODE_(READ|WRITE) & BLK_OPEN_(READ|WRITE) bit values, so it didn't result in a bug, but it was hard to read and understand, so I cleaned it up. In doing so, I noticed that the only call to vdev_bdev_mode() without the "exclusive" flag set was in that misuse, and actually, we never do a non-exclusive blkdev_get_by_path(). So I've just made exclusive be always-on. Sponsored-by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored-by: Wasabi Technology, Inc. Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#15995
tonyhutter
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2024
43e8f6e introduced a subtle API misuse, in that it passed the output from vdev_bdev_mode() back into itself. Fortunately, the SPA_MODE_(READ|WRITE) bit values exactly map to the FMODE_(READ|WRITE) & BLK_OPEN_(READ|WRITE) bit values, so it didn't result in a bug, but it was hard to read and understand, so I cleaned it up. In doing so, I noticed that the only call to vdev_bdev_mode() without the "exclusive" flag set was in that misuse, and actually, we never do a non-exclusive blkdev_get_by_path(). So I've just made exclusive be always-on. Sponsored-by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored-by: Wasabi Technology, Inc. Reviewed by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Allan Jude <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]> Closes #15995
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation and Context
Results of a fruitless line of investigation while debugging #15588.
Description
43e8f6e introduced a subtle API misuse, in that it passed the output from vdev_bdev_mode() back into itself. Fortunately, the SPA_MODE_(READ|WRITE) bit values exactly map to the FMODE_(READ|WRITE) & BLK_OPEN_(READ|WRITE) bit values, so it didn't result in a bug, but it was hard to read and understand, so I cleaned it up.
In doing so, I noticed that the only call to vdev_bdev_mode() without the "exclusive" flag set was in that misuse, and actually, we never do a non-exclusive blkdev_get_by_path(). So I've just made exclusive be always-on.
How Has This Been Tested?
sanityrunfile passed on kernel 6.7.7.zpool_createandzpool_reopentags passed on 6.7.9, 5.10.170 and 4.14.336.Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by.