Virtuozzo 7 kernel compat: support HAVE_VFS_DIRECT_IO_ITER_RW_OFFSET … #11411
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Virtuozzo 7 kernels starting 3.10.0-1127.18.2.vz7.163.46
have the following configuration:
* no HAVE_VFS_RW_ITERATE
* HAVE_VFS_DIRECT_IO_ITER_RW_OFFSET
=> let's add implementation of zpl_direct_IO() via
zpl_aio_{read,write}() in this case.
https://bugs.openvz.org/browse/OVZ-7243
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#11410
Issue openzfs#11410
finist0
force-pushed
the
branch_direct_IO_via_iovec
branch
from
b7091c6 to
83546b7
Compare
behlendorf
approved these changes
Dec 29, 2020
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2021
Virtuozzo 7 kernels starting 3.10.0-1127.18.2.vz7.163.46
have the following configuration:
* no HAVE_VFS_RW_ITERATE
* HAVE_VFS_DIRECT_IO_ITER_RW_OFFSET
=> let's add implementation of zpl_direct_IO() via
zpl_aio_{read,write}() in this case.
https://bugs.openvz.org/browse/OVZ-7243
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <[email protected]>
Closes #11410
Closes #11411
jsai20
pushed a commit
to jsai20/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2021
Virtuozzo 7 kernels starting 3.10.0-1127.18.2.vz7.163.46
have the following configuration:
* no HAVE_VFS_RW_ITERATE
* HAVE_VFS_DIRECT_IO_ITER_RW_OFFSET
=> let's add implementation of zpl_direct_IO() via
zpl_aio_{read,write}() in this case.
https://bugs.openvz.org/browse/OVZ-7243
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#11410
Closes openzfs#11411
sempervictus
pushed a commit
to sempervictus/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2021
Virtuozzo 7 kernels starting 3.10.0-1127.18.2.vz7.163.46
have the following configuration:
* no HAVE_VFS_RW_ITERATE
* HAVE_VFS_DIRECT_IO_ITER_RW_OFFSET
=> let's add implementation of zpl_direct_IO() via
zpl_aio_{read,write}() in this case.
https://bugs.openvz.org/browse/OVZ-7243
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#11410
Closes openzfs#11411
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…+ no HAVE_VFS_RW_ITERATE case
Virtuozzo 7 kernels starting 3.10.0-1127.18.2.vz7.163.46
have the following configuration:
=> let's add implementation of zpl_direct_IO() via
zpl_aio_{read,write}() in this case.
https://bugs.openvz.org/browse/OVZ-7243
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko [email protected]
Closes #11410
Issue #11410
Motivation and Context
Description
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by.