0.6.5.2 hangs on large rsync jobs #3867
Comments
|
Stack traces for the hung processes (from dmesg): [23617.581529] INFO: task BackupPC_dump:20068 blocked for more than 120 seconds. |
|
@rgmiller sorry to hear that. It appears that your still able to tickle a case where dynamically creating threads can wedge the system when there's significant memory pressure. Please set |
|
OK. I've set spl_taskq_thread_dynamic to 0. I'll post a follow-up after the server has run for a couple of days (or if it hangs). |
|
OK, the server has been running without major issues for 2 days now, so it appears that setting spl_taskq_thread_dynamic=0 is a reasonable workaround for now. FWIW: things aren't perfect. I've got some anecdotal evidence that other processes can become starved for I/O when the BackupPC jobs are running. Specifically, I have a streaming music server on that machine that reads from a different zpool. I don't have any stack traces because nothing crashed, but it was definitely stuck in an I/O Wait state long enough for the individual players to play through their internal buffers and then stop. Both times this happened, it was right after a BackupPC job started. |
|
@rgmiller thanks for following up, this is exactly the kind of feedback we need to get. My suggestion would be to stick with |
|
Not sure if this helps or not but initial problem was also linked to my issue 3834. I'm still on 0.6.5.1 and managed to work around it by setting vm.min_free_kbytes to 1048576. Didn't try a lower value. |
|
Just a quick follow-up: zfs locked up again tonight. I'm actually running 0.6.5.3 at this point (with spl_taskq_thread_dynamic set to 0). It had been running find since I set spl_taskq_thread_dynamic manually after @behlendorf suggested it. So, it appears that we've still got issues; they're just much less likely. dmesg text pasted below. [430985.003872] INFO: task z_wr_iss:2300 blocked for more than 120 seconds. |
|
Just a quick note to say that I experienced another lockup over the weekend. (This is on 0.6.5.3 with spl_taskq_thread_dynamic set to 0.) I have the stack traces from dmesg, but they don't look too different from the ones I've already posted, so I'm not going to bother unless someone wants them. |
|
@rgmiller sorry about the slow reply. The good news is that thanks to the stacks you posted I'm pretty sure I've identified the deadlock you're hitting. If I'm correct you should be able to prevent it by setting the |
|
Great. I'll give it a try this evening. What should I do about the spl_taskq_thread_dynamic setting? It's currently at 0. I assume I should turn it back on again, yes? |
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either success or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
...
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Issue openzfs#3808
Issue openzfs#3867
|
@rgmiller you should be able to leave the default. For 0.6.5.3 this is |
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Issue openzfs#3808
Issue openzfs#3867
|
Just a quick update: I installed patch #4111 this evening and it's running now. The overnight backup jobs are what normally caused problems, so I'll leave another update after it's run for a couple more days. |
|
The overnight backup jobs have run 3 times now without problems, so it looks like the patch is solid. |
|
@rgmiller excellent news, thanks for following up. |
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <[email protected]>
Closes #3808
Closes #3867
|
First, I want to thank everyone for their hard work. Code is awesome. |
|
Thanks for the confirmation, an 0.6.5.4 is definitely in the works. |
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#3808
Closes openzfs#3867
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#3808
Closes openzfs#3867
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#3808
Closes openzfs#3867
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#3808
Closes openzfs#3867
This deadlock may manifest itself in slightly different ways but
at the core it is caused by a memory allocation blocking on file-
system reclaim in the zio pipeline. This is normally impossible
because zio_execute() disables filesystem reclaim by setting
PF_FSTRANS on the thread. However, kmem cache allocations may
still indirectly block on file system reclaim while holding the
critical vq->vq_lock as shown below.
To resolve this issue zio_buf_alloc_flags() is introduced which
allocation flags to be passed. This can then be used in
vdev_queue_aggregate() with KM_NOSLEEP when allocating the
aggregate IO buffer. Since aggregating the IO is purely a
performance optimization we want this to either succeed or fail
quickly. Trying too hard to allocate this memory under the
vq->vq_lock can negatively impact performance and result in
this deadlock.
* z_wr_iss
zio_vdev_io_start
vdev_queue_io -> Takes vq->vq_lock
vdev_queue_io_to_issue
vdev_queue_aggregate
zio_buf_alloc -> Waiting on spl_kmem_cache process
* z_wr_int
zio_vdev_io_done
vdev_queue_io_done
mutex_lock -> Waiting on vq->vq_lock held by z_wr_iss
* txg_sync
spa_sync
dsl_pool_sync
zio_wait -> Waiting on zio being handled by z_wr_int
* spl_kmem_cache
spl_cache_grow_work
kv_alloc
spl_vmalloc
...
evict
zpl_evict_inode
zfs_inactive
dmu_tx_wait
txg_wait_open -> Waiting on txg_sync
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chase <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#3808
Closes openzfs#3867
I'm afraid 0.6.5.2 still has problems with large rsync jobs (from BackupPC). My server isn't completely locked up; I can at least log in and poke around. All 4 cores (the CPU is a quad core Xeon) are sitting at 100%, though. Access to the zpool that was being written to appears to be completely blocked (a simple 'ls' hung) but I can read and write to a separate zpool on the same server.
This may be related to issue #3808. (It's the same computer running the same BackupPC jobs anyway.)
I'll paste the stack traces below.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: