-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OpenSuse integration #378
Comments
next issue pomaranca:/ # service zfs restart |
Thanks for the bug report. It looks like the packaging isn't 100% compatible with SUSE. I'm personally not that familiar with the distribution but I'm happy to take tweaks to the spec files and init scripts to make them compatible. |
i had a few hangs of the zfs in past days Linux pomaranca 2.6.37.6-52-xen #1 SMP 2011-08-31 12:51:56 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux pomaranca:~/zfs # ps auxc|grep D kernel call trace: |
Linux kernel 3.17 removes the action function argument from wait_on_bit(). Add autoconf test and compatibility macro to support the new interface. The former "wait_on_bit" interface required an 'action' function to be provided which does the actual waiting. There were over 20 such functions in the kernel, many of them identical, though most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions: one which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule(). This API change was made to consolidate all of those redundant wait functions. References: torvalds/linux@7431620 Signed-off-by: Ned Bass <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#378
…nzfs#378) Wrap `serde_json::from_slice()` with a helper function that will add additional context when it fails, including the type we were trying to decode it as, and the actual JSON string.
Hi,
i am testing on opensuse 11.4 with Linux 2.6.37.6-50-xen git clone on 29.8.2011
compile went fine, but had issues with
pomaranca:~/zfs/zfs # rpm -i zfs-dracut-0.6.0-rc5.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
dracut is needed by zfs-dracut-0.6.0-rc5.x86_64
i had to install it with --nodep
next the test
pomaranca:~/zfs/zfs/scripts # sudo /usr/libexec/zfs/zconfig.sh -c
1 persistent zpool.cache zfs.sh: Unload these modules with 'zfs.sh -u':
zfs zcommon zunicode znvpair zavl spl
Fail (1)
pomaranca:
/zfs/zfs/scripts # ./zfs.sh -u zfs zcommon zunicode znvpair zavl spl/zfs/zfs/scripts # sudo /usr/libexec/zfs/zconfig.sh -cpomaranca:
1 persistent zpool.cache zfs.sh: Unload these modules with 'zfs.sh -u':
zfs zcommon zunicode znvpair zavl spl
Fail (1)
pomaranca:
/zfs/zfs/scripts # ./zfs.sh -u spl/zfs/zfs/scripts # ./zfs.sh -u zavlpomaranca:
pomaranca:
/zfs/zfs/scripts # ./zfs.sh -u zunicode/zfs/zfs/scripts # sudo /usr/libexec/zfs/zconfig.sh -cpomaranca:
1 persistent zpool.cache zfs.sh: Unload these modules with 'zfs.sh -u':
zfs zcommon zunicode znvpair zavl spl
Fail (1)
other than that, raidz is working fine,
but i am wondering, if the speed i am getting on zfs is ok,
i had raidz build from same disks on freenas 8.0.1 and get ~140mb/s write,
on opensuse i get only ~92mb/s with same disks, with same zpool, but i did upgrade the pool
any tweeks?
Kristijan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: