Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 26, 2020. It is now read-only.

Taskq improvements #455

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

behlendorf
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Under Illumos taskq_wait() returns when there are no more tasks
in the queue.  This behavior differs from ZoL and FreeBSD where
taskq_wait() returns when all the tasks in the queue at the
beginning of the taskq_wait() call are complete.  New tasks
added whilst taskq_wait() is running will be ignored.

This difference in semantics makes it possible that new subtle
issues could be introduced when porting changes from Illumos.
To avoid that possibility the taskq_wait() function is being
updated such that it blocks until the queue in empty.

The previous behavior remains available through the
taskq_wait_outstanding() interface.  Note that this function
was previously called taskq_wait_all() but has been renamed
to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Chris Dunlop <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Setting the TASKQ_DYNAMIC flag will create a taskq with dynamic
semantics.  Initially only a single worker thread will be created
to service tasks dispatched to the queue.  As additional threads
are needed they will be dynamically spawned up to the max number
specified by 'nthreads'.  When the threads are no longer needed,
because the taskq is empty, they will automatically terminate.

Due to the low cost of creating and destroying threads under Linux
by default new threads and spawned and terminated aggressively.
There are two modules options which can be tuned to adjust this
behavior if needed.

* spl_taskq_thread_sequential - The number of sequential tasks,
without interruption, which needed to be handled by a worker
thread before a new worker thread is spawned.  Default 1.

* spl_taskq_thread_dynamic - Provides the ability to completely
disable the use of dynamic taskqs on the system.  This is provided
for the purposes of debugging and troubleshooting.  Default 1
(enabled).

This behavior is consistent with the dynamic taskq implemenation
found in both illumos and FreeBSD.

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Add the TASKQ_DYNAMIC flag to the kmem_cache and system taskqs
to reduce the number of idle threads on the system.  Additional
threads will be created on demand up to the previous maximum
thread counts.  This should have minimal, if any, impact on
performance.

This makes the system taskq consistent with illumos which is
always created as a dynamic taskq with up to 64 threads.

The task limits for the kmem_cache have been increased to avoid
any unnessisary throttling and to keep a larger reserve of
task_t structures on the free list.

Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
@behlendorf behlendorf force-pushed the taskq-improvements branch from 7656bda to a0f5e41 Compare June 5, 2015 21:19
@behlendorf behlendorf closed this in a876b03 Jun 9, 2015
kernelOfTruth pushed a commit to kernelOfTruth/spl that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2015
Under Illumos taskq_wait() returns when there are no more tasks
in the queue.  This behavior differs from ZoL and FreeBSD where
taskq_wait() returns when all the tasks in the queue at the
beginning of the taskq_wait() call are complete.  New tasks
added whilst taskq_wait() is running will be ignored.

This difference in semantics makes it possible that new subtle
issues could be introduced when porting changes from Illumos.
To avoid that possibility the taskq_wait() function is being
updated such that it blocks until the queue in empty.

The previous behavior remains available through the
taskq_wait_outstanding() interface.  Note that this function
was previously called taskq_wait_all() but has been renamed
to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Chris Dunlop <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#455
@behlendorf behlendorf deleted the taskq-improvements branch July 28, 2017 22:09
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants