Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[openwrt-23.05] podman: update to 4.7.1 #22399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2023

Conversation

oskarirauta
Copy link
Contributor

backport update podman to 4.7.1 for openwrt-23.05
differences to development tree: musl-1.2.4 patch not included, because it's not used in openwrt-23.05

I have received several issue reports on difficulties and problems with podman containers with stable release version of openwrt. So I am backporting up to date versions to be able help solve these issues.

Maintainer: me
Compile tested: x86_64

Bugfixes

 - Fixed a bug involving non-English locales of Windows where machine installs using user-mode networking were rejected due to erroneous version detection (openwrt#20209).
 - Fixed a regression in --env-file handling (openwrt#19565).
 - Fixed a bug where podman inspect would fail when stat'ing a device failed.

API
 - The network list compat API endpoint is now much faster (openwrt#20035).

Openwrt updates: added patch to allow building with musl-1.2.4
Patch source is from gentoo https://github.com/vimproved/gentoo/blob/c4c349f11a4352be1965726eadfe3a8bd8a6fa9c/app-containers/podman/files/podman-4.5.0-fix-build-with-musl-1.2.4.patch

Issue was discussed by @jefferyto at mattn/go-sqlite3#1177

remarks:
removed musl-1.2.4 patch from commit, since that version of musl
is not available with openwrt-23.05

Signed-off-by: Oskari Rauta <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e25d417)
@1715173329 1715173329 merged commit 7fe0677 into openwrt:openwrt-23.05 Oct 14, 2023
2 of 12 checks passed
@oskarirauta oskarirauta deleted the podman-23.05 branch November 30, 2023 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants