Project proposal to move DCQL to OWF

[TimoGlastra]

Still need to add a sponsor, and want to get a review from @auer-martin first.

[auer-martin]

LGTM

[lukasjhan]

Hi @TimoGlastra, Wow your projects looks really great!

[tkuhrt]

@TimoGlastra : Will you be available on January 8, 2025 to represent this proposal?

[TimoGlastra]

@TimoGlastra : Will you be available on January 8, 2025 to represent this proposal?

Yes, as long as it doesn't clash with the Wallet Interoperability SIG!

[tkuhrt]

This should be the week of the offset meeting due to the TAC call. The SIG call would follow immediately after. See you on January 8. Have a good holiday period.

[tkuhrt]

I did not see any DCO on the commits. This will also need to be updated prior to bringing it over to OWF. Otherwise, this looks like an interesting lab, and I approve it.

[TimoGlastra]

This should be the week of the offset meeting due to the TAC call. The SIG call would follow immediately after. See you on January 8. Have a good holiday period.

Perfect, thanks. You too 🎅

[TimoGlastra]

I did not see any DCO on the commits. This will also need to be updated prior to bringing it over to OWF. Otherwise, this looks like an interesting lab, and I approve it.

I think it's for the suggestions i comitted. Once ready to merge based on feedback i'll squash everything

[tkuhrt]

I did not see any DCO on the commits. This will also need to be updated prior to bringing it over to OWF. Otherwise, this looks like an interesting lab, and I approve it.

I think it's for the suggestions i comitted. Once ready to merge based on feedback i'll squash everything

This was related to the project repo, not this PR. Just to be sure we are on the same page.

[TimoGlastra]

Something I'd like input on during the TAC WG or here: I've been chatting with @marsouin and @auer-martin a PEX light library that will be very similar in design as this DCQL library. Should we propose this as a separate lab project? Can it fall under this one and we make it "credential query languages typescript" project (but still two repositories)?

[TimoGlastra]

I did not see any DCO on the commits. This will also need to be updated prior to bringing it over to OWF. Otherwise, this looks like an interesting lab, and I approve it.

I think it's for the suggestions i comitted. Once ready to merge based on feedback i'll squash everything

This was related to the project repo, not this PR. Just to be sure we are on the same page.

Misunderstood you there, opened an issue: auer-martin/dcql#25

[tkuhrt]

Something I'd like input on during the TAC WG or here: I've been chatting with @marsouin and @auer-martin a PEX light library that will be very similar in design as this DCQL library. Should we propose this as a separate lab project? Can it fall under this one and we make it "credential query languages typescript" project (but still two repositories)?

A single lab can have multiple repositories. We typically use some sort of prefix to group the repos. Something like "CQL-repo1" and "CQL-repo2". We would just need to determine the correct prefix, which should be based on the name of the lab.

[auer-martin]

I'll be looking at the dco and the other issues in the dcql repository over the weekend