Increase promote did retries

[jamshale]

Doh! I think I must have accidentally deleted the wait in between retries somehow and not noticed.

Hopefully this should prevent the errors during promote did.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[swcurran]

Test fail is super interesting — a CredDef that is attempting to be published fails because it already exists on the ledger. I checked the ledger and N1LoA9rMwyskHEW9csYpQJ:3:CL:360946:Faber.agent.Schema_DriversLicense_v2 was created on Feb. 16 — http://test.bcovrin.vonx.io:3707/tx/BCOVRIN_TEST/domain/360950.

How does that happen? That means that the DID being used in the test was the same as being used on Feb. 16.

🤯

[jamshale]

Test fail is super interesting — a CredDef that is attempting to be published fails because it already exists on the ledger. I checked the ledger and N1LoA9rMwyskHEW9csYpQJ:3:CL:360946:Faber.agent.Schema_DriversLicense_v2 was created on Feb. 16 — http://test.bcovrin.vonx.io:3707/tx/BCOVRIN_TEST/domain/360950.

How does that happen? That means that the DID being used in the test was the same as being used on Feb. 16.

🤯

That's the other fail I've seen. Not as often.

Feb 16. That doesn't make any sense???

[swcurran]

The only thing I can think of is that the same seed for the DID was generated on both test runs. Is it possible we’re not being random enough when coming up with the seed?

[jamshale]

I just had another fail like this 69HTqHL7PjCS8K4Bp44g46:3:CL:293648:Faber.agent.Schema_DriversLicense_v2 from Jan 29. Seems like the tests must be recreating the same dids :/