Enable presentation issuance/verification through vc-api endpoints

[PatStLouis]

This PR enables presentation issuance and verification using the vc_ld manager and addresses #2693.

There is also 4 new routes included matching the vc-api specification. (minor changes from the /vc/ldp endpoints, mostly key names and defaulting to Ed25519Signature2018 proofType for issuance).
@dbluhm could you help me by reviewing the changes I've made to the vc_ld manager and models? You will see I added an if condition in the verify_presentation section to enable assertionMethod purpose if no challenge is provided, while minimizing the impact on the existing code/workflows. I also improved the presentation models, based on the existing credential ones.

I have a test instance of these changes running here.

[PatStLouis]

The last commit added a method to store an issued VC

[swcurran]

I'm trying to re-run the failed test, as it doesn't look like it is related to this PR.

You had flagged this is a [WIP], @PatStLouis , so I marked it as a "Draft" PR. Have you completed it at this point?

Thanks!

[swcurran]

Ah...also there are conflicts with this PR to be resolved. Could you also look at that @PatStLouis ? Thanks!

[PatStLouis]

@swcurran yeah I noticed the tests were failing because it wasn't able to write a schema on the ledger which seemed odd, looks like it passed now. Let me fix the conflicts then I would consider this ready.

[swcurran]

@PatStLouis — looks like this is near ready. Can you pleae update with the base branch so we can merge it?

[PatStLouis]

@swcurran @dbluhm @ianco I'm happy with the state of this PR. I will make a subsequent PR with a postman collection in the demo folder, which will include documentation about these endpoints as well as simple test cases.

[swcurran]

Sounds good. The documentation is missing and that is a concern, so that needs to be added.

[ianco]

Sounds good. The documentation is missing and that is a concern, so that needs to be added.

Agree we need the documentation and we can deal with the rest in a subsequent PR.

[PatStLouis]

Sounds good, I will add this tonight, I will put a small abstract on the main readme with a link to a page in the demo folder with more information!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[PatStLouis]

@dbluhm I added a manger test for the storage function

[dbluhm]

I'm happy with these changes!

[swcurran]

@ianco — are your change requests ok now?

[dbluhm]

@PatStLouis if you want to do one final merge of main, I've enabled auto merge so we can get this merged in next.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud