fix: routing behind mediator

[dbluhm]

This is a reopen of PR #2535 (after I botched my git command...). Thanks again @codespree for the fix.

[dbluhm]

I'll tack a quick test case onto this PR as a regression test.

[swcurran]

@dbluhm — can you cherry pick this into a v0.10.4 branch (or v0.10.3 and I’ll just tag it from there) and I’ll publish an image for testing. Once we have that we can do a 0.10.4.

Thanks @codespree for the fix. Hoping that once I publish an image, you can give it a try.

[dbluhm]

@swcurran how about a 0.10.x branch and then we can delete the old 0.10.2 and 3 branches?

[swcurran]

Sure. As long as it is not 0.10.4. That you mean the x literally. If you do mean 4, then add a ”v” in front.

[dbluhm]

#2537 PR to 0.10.x. I'll let the tests run (I don't expect anything to be different enough between main and 0.10.x to cause issues but just in case) and merge once they complete.

[dbluhm]

https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-cloudagent-python/tree/0.10.x is now ready for an image publish

[codespree]

https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-cloudagent-python/tree/0.10.x is now ready for an image publish

Looks good! I also verified with a base58 key F7cEyTgzUbFwHsTwC2cK2Zy8bdraeoMY8921gyDmefwK by adding it as a routingKey and the code works well.

In the test case we already have did:key:z6Mko2LnynhGbkPQdZ3PQBUgCmrzdH9aJe7HTs4LKontx8Ge, did:key:z6Mko2LnynhGbkPQdZ3PQBUgCmrzdH9aJe7HTs4LKontx8Ge#z6Mko2LnynhGbkPQdZ3PQBUgCmrzdH9aJe7HTs4LKontx8Ge, perhaps we should add another service with the routingKey as F7cEyTgzUbFwHsTwC2cK2Zy8bdraeoMY8921gyDmefwK. That would cover all cases.

[codespree]

@dbluhm @swcurran I updated my local environments (mediator and web agent) to use the branch created:

pip install git+https://github.com/hyperledger/[email protected]

I am happy to report that everything works as expected.

[swcurran]

Should I go ahead with the release? What about the other question about the mediator - #2531?

[codespree]

Should I go ahead with the release? What about the other question about the mediator - #2531?

@swcurran I have tested the mediator from a mobile agent and have also tested message queuing so, from my perspective, a release would be good.

Thanks @dbluhm for providing inputs on debugging and for merging the PR.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[dbluhm]

@swcurran I think this is good for a merge, based on @codespree's testing.