-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updating base images from slim-buster to slim-bullseye #2105
Updating base images from slim-buster to slim-bullseye #2105
Conversation
Signed-off-by: pradeepp88 <[email protected]>
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
@WadeBarnes thanks for running the tests. It looks like the integration tests are failing, does this have to do anything with the base Docker images? I see that they are being built from Dockerfile.demo and Dockerfile.bdd, do we need to update them? Please let me know, thanks. |
Any ideas on the integration test? @ianco — is this an intermittent failure? Do you have a list of tests that fail intermittently so that we can both try to improve them, and know when it is a real failure vs. an intermittent one? Perhaps a doc file we can reference in the repo? |
The failing tests have nothing to do with the changes made here. I've restarted them to see if it's just and intermittent issue. |
It was an intermittent failure. |
FYI I can run
... which is weird because when I run
(ok I guess it's not weird, one is using |
If I set Not sure what python version we should be targetting? |
@ianco, Python 3.9, and 3.6 for legacy. |
Creating this PR to update the base docker images from
slim-buster
toslim-bullseye
version as the slim-buster image is reported to have known vulnerabilities identified by scanning tools like Snyk and Qualys. This relates to #2087 where this is discussed.Signed-off-by: pradeepp88 [email protected]