Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
did-exchange implicit request pthid update & invitation key verification #1599
did-exchange implicit request pthid update & invitation key verification #1599
Changes from all commits
6103967
dcb5cfd
a142c9d
6ea511f
acac74d
4c1a1df
9c85423
9da4918
a26ff55
3ecbdeb
0b62eb3
790ab5e
b661cc0
aabb96e
84e407e
7a9295e
3849d51
ed19dcc
29736df
ff5337e
9c998e0
2afaae8
91d49be
ab22fcb
96a0404
40ae949
9ce96be
e11f021
1fbc77a
3fae679
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This checks whether the did document is signed with the first verification method (code above in this file assign conn_rec.invitation_key to first verificationMethod). I think this should be signed using an
authentication
key. Also I'm not sure which key we should check (the RFC is not very clear), but it could be signed with the second (or third)authentication
key I guess.Maybe @andrewwhitehead has some insights on this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based upon the clarification received during Aries WG 2022/03/23, updated verify method and now using
jws.header.kid
to verify signature.