Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide nightly builds for ACA-Py #2250

Closed
usingtechnology opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2421
Closed

Provide nightly builds for ACA-Py #2250

usingtechnology opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2421
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed High Priority

Comments

@usingtechnology
Copy link
Contributor

For developers that require access to bug fixes, we should provide nightly builds (or build on merge to main?) of the ACA-Py images.

Investigate if we can leverage a nightly build in AATH or other testing situations.

@swcurran swcurran added help wanted Extra attention is needed High Priority labels Jul 18, 2023
@swcurran
Copy link
Contributor

@Gavinok

@WadeBarnes
Copy link
Contributor

WadeBarnes commented Aug 11, 2023

Nightly builds would be sufficient. Building on merge to main would cause unnecessary strain on Hyperledger's GitHub actions runner time allotments.

The nightly builds should incorporate the nightly test runs and only build/publish on success. The workflow should only run if there are changes to the repo since the previous run, there is no point in wasting precious runner time. This would be a good enhancement for the nightly tests regardless.

The workflows you want to look at are:

Ignore https://github.com/hyperledger/aries-cloudagent-python/blob/main/.github/workflows/publish-indy.yml, because we're dropping support for the indy-sdk releases and this workflow will go away.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed High Priority
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants