Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure user authentication sessions are independent #364

Merged

Conversation

esune
Copy link
Member

@esune esune commented Oct 12, 2023

Resolves #362

Previously, the user authentication sessions was always leaning on the same "fake user" in the Userinfo database to store data temporarily. This lead to issues when multiple concurrent authentication requests were attempted: data from a user authentication session would pollute other user authentication sessions, leaking information.

The fix involved:

  • defining a custom VCUserinfo class that overrides the methods in Userinfo responsible for returning data
  • ensuring each authentication request is associated with a new, random user identifier to prevent polluting existing data
  • in order to support both scenarios were the proof defines/doesn't define a subject_identifier, the generation of the claims object was updated to only include the sub claim if the proof-request defines one, and ensuring the token endpoint accounts for the custom sub, if present.

@esune esune requested review from Jsyro and jamshale October 12, 2023 21:40
Copy link
Contributor

@jamshale jamshale left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd need to study this more to fully understand why the problem occurred.

It looks like you know what you're doing though 👍

@esune
Copy link
Member Author

esune commented Oct 12, 2023

I'd need to study this more to fully understand why the problem occurred.

It looks like you know what you're doing though 👍

Added two notes to try and clarify, but I am confident this is the right approach. It definitely was painful to figure out what the underlying library was doing 😅

@esune esune merged commit 3b493c1 into openwallet-foundation:2.0-development Oct 12, 2023
2 checks passed
@esune esune deleted the fix/subject-identifier branch October 12, 2023 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants