ci(workflows): support automated patch version tag #2773
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Walkthrough此PR引入了对补丁版本标签自动化的支持，主要涉及CI工作流的更改。通过这些更改，补丁版本的标签可以自动生成和管理，简化了发布流程。 Changes
|
WalkthroughThis PR introduces support for patch version labeling automation and mainly involves changes to the CI workflow. With these changes, labels for patch releases can be automatically generated and managed, streamlining the release process. Changes
|
|
[e2e-test-warn] The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug". Please make sure you've read our contributing guide |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/auto-all-publish.yml (1)
Line range hint
8-9: Consider using ubuntu-latest instead of windows-latestRunning CI/CD workflows on Windows can lead to potential issues:
- Path separator differences
- Shell command compatibility
- Performance considerations
- Inconsistency with typical CI/CD environments
Consider switching to
ubuntu-latestunless Windows-specific builds are required.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/auto-all-publish.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: PR Unit Test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/auto-all-publish.yml (3)
Line range hint
9-11: LGTM! Simplified outputs configurationThe removal of the
publishVersionoutput while maintainingbranchVersionis a good simplification that still preserves the necessary version information for the checkout step.
53-53: Verify version handling in build:ui commandThe removal of explicit version tagging (
-tparameter) means the build will use default versioning. Please verify:
- How version information is now determined during the build
- Whether this maintains consistency with semantic versioning
- If version synchronization across packages is affected
Let's check the build script configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Version handling is correctly managed without explicit tag parameter
The removal of the version tag parameter from
build:uiis correct as versioning is properly managed through:
- Lerna's independent versioning configuration
- Conventional commits for version determination
- Package-level version management in package.json files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check build:ui script definition and version handling rg -A 5 "build:ui" "package.json"Length of output: 1525
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check CLI's build:ui script and version handling rg -A 5 "build:ui" "internals/cli/package.json" # Check for version-related configurations rg -l "version" "internals/cli" # Look for lerna.json to understand version management cat lerna.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No lerna.json found"Length of output: 1853
56-56: Clarify the purpose of the new-d saasparameterWhile removing version tagging is aligned with the PR objectives, the addition of
-d saasparameter wasn't mentioned in the PR description. Please clarify:
- The purpose of the new destination parameter
- Why this change is necessary
- The impact on the build output structure
Let's examine the build configuration and any related changes:
✅ Verification successful
The
-d saasparameter is a valid design specification flagThe parameter is used to build the saas-common package with SaaS theme specifications, which is the intended behavior. This ensures proper bundling of theme-related dependencies and prevents circular dependencies in the build output.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other saas-related configurations and usages rg -A 5 "saas-common" # Check if the saas directory is referenced elsewhere rg -A 5 "\-d saas"Length of output: 5214
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check build command implementation ast-grep --pattern 'build:ui' # Check CLI implementation fd build-ui.ts --exec cat {}Length of output: 14992
PR
支持补丁版本tag自动化
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit