Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(checkbox): modify mobile problem #2666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

fix(checkbox): modify mobile problem #2666

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

James-9696
Copy link
Collaborator

@James-9696 James-9696 commented Dec 17, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Checkbox labels now display text as inner content instead of using the label attribute.
    • The checkbox component can emit 'change' and 'update:modelValue' events to notify parent components of state changes.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced accessibility features for checkbox components, including conditional rendering and aria-hidden attributes.
  • Documentation

    • Updated naming conventions for components to include prefixes for better identification.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the checkbox components across multiple files in the mobile component library. The changes primarily focus on enhancing component naming conventions, updating type definitions, and refining the checkbox group and individual checkbox implementations. The modifications include updating component names with a prefix, adding new events, improving type imports, and adjusting how checkbox labels are rendered in the user interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/sites/demos/mobile/app/checkbox/checkbox-group.vue Updated checkbox labels to include text as children elements instead of using only the label attribute
packages/mobile/components/checkbox-group/src/mobile.vue Added name and componentName properties, updated emits to include 'change' and 'update:modelValue' events
packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/checkbox.ts Restored type imports, updated ICheckboxApi interface with precise return types for various methods
packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/mobile.vue Updated component naming with $prefix, added name and componentName properties
packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/renderless/index.ts Modified computedIsGroup function parameter from parent to vm

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CheckboxGroup
    participant Checkbox
    User->>CheckboxGroup: Interact with checkboxes
    CheckboxGroup->>Checkbox: Update state
    Checkbox-->>CheckboxGroup: Emit 'change' event
    CheckboxGroup->>User: Reflect updated selection
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr

Poem

🐰 Checkboxes dance with glee,
Prefixed names, now they're free!
Types refined, events so bright,
Mobile components take their flight!
A rabbit's code, both smart and light! 🎉

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/checkbox.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-1: Add tests for the bug fix

According to the PR objectives, tests haven't been added for this bug fix. Given that this is a critical mobile functionality, tests are essential.

Please add tests covering:

  1. The mobile checkbox behavior that was fixed
  2. Edge cases around checkbox group detection
  3. Integration with the mobile component hierarchy

Would you like me to help create a test suite for these scenarios?

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/mobile.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-1: Add tests and documentation for the changes

While the implementation looks good, the PR checklist indicates that tests and documentation updates are missing. Consider:

  1. Adding tests to verify:
    • Checkbox state management
    • Label rendering in both modes (prop vs slot)
    • Accessibility attributes
  2. Updating documentation to explain:
    • Proper label usage to avoid duplication
    • Accessibility features

Would you like help with generating test cases or documentation updates?

packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/checkbox.ts (1)

17-36: Type definitions improve compile-time safety

The addition of explicit type imports and return types in the API interface will help catch potential issues earlier in development. This is a good improvement alongside the bug fix.

Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of each imported type, especially since this is a public API.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 926fb6e and be9913e.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • examples/sites/demos/mobile/app/checkbox/checkbox-group.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/mobile/components/checkbox-group/src/mobile.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/checkbox.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/mobile.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/renderless/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/renderless/vue.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/mobile/components/checkbox-group/src/mobile.vue (1)

35-36: LGTM! Well-structured component definition

The changes follow Vue 3 best practices:

  • Explicit component naming improves debugging experience
  • Proper emits declaration prevents runtime warnings
  • Maintains existing functionality while improving code quality

Also applies to: 41-41

packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/mobile.vue (2)

72-73: LGTM! Consistent component naming

The component naming changes align with the checkbox-group implementation and improve debugging capabilities.


Line range hint 24-63: Verify accessibility implementation

The checkbox implementation uses several ARIA attributes. Let's verify their correctness:

  • aria-hidden is conditionally set based on indeterminate
  • aria-checked uses 'mixed' for indeterminate state
  • Role is properly set for indeterminate checkboxes
✅ Verification successful

Let me try with more generic commands to gather information about accessibility implementation across the codebase.


ARIA attributes implementation is consistent and correct

The implementation of ARIA attributes in the checkbox component follows accessibility best practices and maintains consistency across different versions:

  • The indeterminate state correctly uses aria-checked="mixed"
  • The role="checkbox" is properly applied when in indeterminate state
  • tabindex and aria-hidden attributes are consistently implemented across mobile and PC versions
  • The conditional logic for all ARIA attributes follows the same pattern in all implementations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent ARIA attribute usage across the codebase

# Search for other checkbox implementations to ensure consistency
rg -l 'aria-(hidden|checked).*indeterminate' --type vue

# Check for potential accessibility issues in checkbox components
ast-grep --pattern 'role="checkbox"' --lang vue

Length of output: 242


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ARIA attributes in all files, without specifying file type
rg -l 'aria-(hidden|checked).*indeterminate'

# Search for role="checkbox" in all files
rg 'role="checkbox"' -A 2 -B 2

# Find all potential checkbox component files
fd -g "*checkbox*.vue"

Length of output: 2802


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation in other checkbox components to verify consistency
rg 'aria-(hidden|checked).*indeterminate' -A 2 -B 2 packages/vue/src/checkbox/src/mobile.vue packages/vue/src/checkbox/src/pc.vue packages/vue/src/checkbox/src/mobile-first.vue

# Check for tabindex usage with indeterminate state
rg 'tabindex.*indeterminate' -A 2 -B 2

# Look for other accessibility attributes in checkbox components
rg ':(aria-|role=|tabindex=)' -A 2 -B 2 packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/mobile.vue

Length of output: 5395

packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/renderless/index.ts (1)

114-116: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify the checkbox group detection behavior on mobile devices

The change from parent to vm parameter affects how we traverse the component hierarchy to find the checkbox group. While this might fix the mobile issue, we should verify the behavior in different scenarios.

Since this is a bug fix, please add test cases to cover:

  1. Nested checkbox groups
  2. Deep component hierarchies
  3. Mobile-specific scenarios
✅ Verification successful

The change from parent to vm parameter is safe and correctly implemented

Based on the code analysis:

  1. The computedIsGroup implementation correctly traverses the component hierarchy using vm.$parent to find the checkbox group component.
  2. The function maintains the same logic of checking for componentName === CHECKBOX_GROUP while traversing up.
  3. The state management and group detection remain consistent with the component's architecture.

The change appears to be a refactoring improvement rather than a bug fix, as:

  • The implementation is properly integrated with Vue's parent-child relationship model
  • The checkbox group detection logic is consistent with the mobile component structure
  • The component registration and usage patterns in the mobile package support this implementation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential checkbox group usage patterns that might be affected
echo "Checking for checkbox group usage patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  render() {
    return (
      <tiny-checkbox-group>
        $$$
      </tiny-checkbox-group>
    )
  }
}'

# Check for any custom implementations that might rely on the old parent reference
rg -l "parent\.\$parent.*checkbox.*group" 

Length of output: 290


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the checkbox group detection behavior

# 1. Find all files that contain checkbox group related code
echo "Files containing checkbox group references:"
rg -l "checkbox.*group" --type-not test

# 2. Check the actual implementation of computedIsGroup in the current and previous versions
echo -e "\nChecking computedIsGroup implementation:"
git log -p -L '/computedIsGroup/,/^  }/:packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/renderless/index.ts'

# 3. Look for any tests related to checkbox groups
echo -e "\nChecking for checkbox group tests:"
fd -e spec.ts -e test.ts | xargs rg -l "checkbox.*group"

# 4. Check for Vue parent-child relationship patterns
echo -e "\nChecking parent-child patterns:"
rg "\$parent.*checkbox" -A 3

Length of output: 1211


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's focus on the mobile checkbox implementation and its group detection

# 1. Check the current implementation in the mobile package
echo "Mobile checkbox implementation:"
rg -A 10 "computedIsGroup" packages/mobile/components/checkbox/

# 2. Look for any mobile-specific tests
echo -e "\nMobile checkbox tests:"
fd -e spec.ts -e test.ts -p mobile.*checkbox | xargs cat

# 3. Check for any related component registration or usage patterns
echo -e "\nChecking component registration and usage:"
rg "checkbox.*group" packages/mobile/ -A 3

# 4. Look for any mobile-specific documentation or examples
echo -e "\nMobile checkbox documentation:"
fd README.md -p mobile.*checkbox | xargs cat

Length of output: 11861

packages/mobile/components/checkbox/src/renderless/vue.ts (1)

111-111: Ensure consistent parent access across all computed properties

The change to use vm instead of parent in computedIsGroup is correctly integrated. However, other computed properties in the API still use parent. Consider reviewing if they should also be updated for consistency.

Comment on lines +4 to +5
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框1">复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框2">复选框2</tiny-checkbox>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove duplicate label text to improve accessibility

The checkbox labels are currently specified both as a label prop and as child content, which could cause screen readers to announce the same text twice.

Apply this change to avoid duplication:

-      <tiny-checkbox label="复选框1">复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
-      <tiny-checkbox label="复选框2">复选框2</tiny-checkbox>
+      <tiny-checkbox label="复选框1" />
+      <tiny-checkbox label="复选框2" />

Or if you prefer using slot content:

-      <tiny-checkbox label="复选框1">复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
-      <tiny-checkbox label="复选框2">复选框2</tiny-checkbox>
+      <tiny-checkbox>复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
+      <tiny-checkbox>复选框2</tiny-checkbox>
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框1">复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框2">复选框2</tiny-checkbox>
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框1" />
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框2" />
Suggested change
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框1">复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
<tiny-checkbox label="复选框2">复选框2</tiny-checkbox>
<tiny-checkbox>复选框1</tiny-checkbox>
<tiny-checkbox>复选框2</tiny-checkbox>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants