Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: optimize algolia search style #2605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kagol
Copy link
Member

@kagol kagol commented Dec 4, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Adjusted positioning of the .search-box for improved layout on larger screens.
    • Updated media query breakpoints for better responsiveness across various screen sizes.
    • Added a new font-size property to the .DocSearch-Container for enhanced readability.

@kagol kagol added the documentation 对文档的改进或补充 label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the CSS file examples/sites/src/style.css, specifically adjusting the positioning of the .search-box element and modifying media query breakpoints. The left property for larger screens and various media queries has been updated, with the removal of an outdated media query. Additionally, a new font-size property has been introduced for the .DocSearch-Container, while the z-index values for elements remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/sites/src/style.css Adjusted .search-box positioning for larger screens and media queries; added font-size to .DocSearch-Container; removed old media query.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr

🐇 In the meadow, a search box did sway,
With a nudge and a tweak, it found its way.
From 360 to 210, a shift so neat,
Now it dances in style, oh what a treat!
With breakpoints adjusted, it’s ready to play,
Hopping along, making bright every day! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2024

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
examples/sites/src/style.css (2)

40-40: Consider using design system tokens for font-size

Instead of hardcoding the font size value, consider using a design system token for better maintainability and consistency.

-  font-size: 14px;
+  font-size: var(--tiny-font-size-base, 14px);

Line range hint 66-78: Consider optimizing media queries

Both media queries set the same left position (230px). Consider consolidating these rules for better maintainability:

-@media screen and (max-width: 814px) {
-  .search-box {
-    left: 230px;
-  }
-}
-
-@media screen and (max-width: 768px) {
+@media screen and (max-width: 814px) {
  .DocSearch-Modal {
    margin-top: 60px;
  }

  .search-box {
    left: 230px;
  }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cab4bc9 and 13cd52d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/sites/src/style.css (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
examples/sites/src/style.css (1)

35-35: Verify layout consistency across different viewports

The search box position has been adjusted to 210px from the left. Please ensure this aligns with the design system's spacing guidelines and doesn't cause layout issues across different screen sizes.

✅ Verification successful

Search box positioning is properly handled across breakpoints

The left position of 210px for the search box is part of a responsive design system with appropriate media query adjustments:

  • Default position: left: 210px
  • Screens ≤ 814px: left: 230px
  • Screens ≤ 768px: left: 230px with additional modal margin adjustments

The positioning is consistent with the header layout and includes proper z-indexing (z-index: 1000) to maintain visibility. The implementation shows careful consideration for different viewport sizes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any related layout configurations or design tokens

# Look for related spacing/positioning values
rg -A 2 '210px|360px' --type css

# Check for any design token definitions
fd -e css -e scss -x rg -l 'spacing|--.*left|position'

Length of output: 464


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the media queries and related positioning in the CSS files
# to understand the responsive behavior and layout consistency

# Check the specific file for media queries and positioning
rg -B 2 -A 4 '@media|position:|left:|right:' examples/sites/src/style.css

# Check design-common.css for any related positioning or layout guidelines
rg -B 2 -A 4 '@media|position:|left:|right:' examples/sites/public/static/css/design-common.css

# Look for any search-related class definitions and their positioning
rg -B 2 -A 4 'search|Search' --type css

Length of output: 9574

Comment on lines +66 to 69
@media screen and (max-width: 814px) {
.search-box {
left: 420px;
left: 230px;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Breakpoint 814px appears inconsistent with design system

The codebase shows a clear pattern of standard breakpoints at 1023px, 768px, and other common values. The 814px breakpoint in the reviewed file appears to be an outlier, especially when compared to the design system's breakpoint at 815px in design-common.css. This suggests a potential misalignment that should be corrected.

  • Consider aligning the 814px breakpoint with the design system's 815px breakpoint in examples/sites/public/static/css/design-common.css
  • The change from 1023px to 814px represents a significant shift that doesn't align with the common breakpoints used across the codebase (768px, 815px, 1023px, 1279px, 1339px)
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify alignment with design system breakpoints

The breakpoint has been changed from 1023px to 814px. Please ensure this aligns with the design system's standard breakpoints.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent breakpoint usage

# Look for other breakpoint definitions
rg -A 2 '@media.*max-width' --type css

Length of output: 1829

@zzcr zzcr merged commit c5e56b6 into dev Dec 4, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 对文档的改进或补充
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants