fix(carousel): [carousel] modify carousel style #2376
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes made in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/theme/src/carousel/index.less (1)
230-230: Documentation update needed.As indicated in the PR checklist, documentation updates haven't been made. Please update the component's documentation to reflect these styling changes, particularly noting the modified spacing behavior for vertical indicators.
Would you like me to help draft the documentation updates for this styling change?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/theme/src/carousel/index.less (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/theme/src/carousel/index.less (1)
230-230: LGTM! Consider mobile touch targets.The padding modification for vertical indicators is appropriate, removing unnecessary horizontal spacing while maintaining vertical spacing. However, ensure that the reduced horizontal space doesn't affect touch targets on mobile devices.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify mobile-related styles and breakpoints.
Let me check the common mixins to see if there are any responsive utilities that might affect the carousel component.
After analyzing the common mixins and searching for mobile-related styles, I can now provide a final response:
Padding change is safe for touch targets
The padding modification from
2px 4pxto2px 0for vertical indicators is safe because:
- The vertical padding of 2px is maintained, which preserves the clickable area's height
- The component doesn't rely on any mobile-specific styles or breakpoints
- The common mixins show no touch-specific utilities that would be affected
- Vertical indicators typically have sufficient width from their container, making horizontal padding less critical for touch targets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any mobile-specific styles or breakpoints that might be affected rg -l "@media.*mobile" --type lessLength of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any media queries or responsive styles in the carousel component rg "@media" packages/theme/src/carousel/index.less # Also check for any responsive variables or mixins that might be imported rg -l "responsive|mobile|breakpoint" --type less packages/theme/src/Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of common mixins for any touch-related or responsive utilities cat packages/theme/src/mixins/common.less # Also check if the carousel component imports these mixins rg "import.*common" packages/theme/src/carousel/index.lessLength of output: 17699
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit