-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 340
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
optimize:Cj subsequent optimization #842
optimize:Cj subsequent optimization #842
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes across multiple components focus on enhancing the layout and functionality of the plugin navigation panel. Key updates include the addition of dynamic class bindings to indicate the drag state, new methods for managing the visibility of an AI component, and improved state management for drag-and-drop interactions. The overall structure of the components has been refined to support these enhancements, leading to a more organized and interactive user interface. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue (2)
169-169
: Reminder: Address the TODO comment for subsequent optimizationThere is a TODO comment indicating that further optimization is needed. Please ensure that this optimization is implemented before the release to enhance performance and maintainability.
Do you need assistance with implementing these optimizations? I can help with suggestions or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
Line range hint
182-183
: Typo: Correct 'prevIdex' to 'prevIndex'The variable
prevIdex
appears to be a typo. It should be corrected toprevIndex
for clarity and consistency throughout the code.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
- state = reactive({ - prevIdex: -2, + state = reactive({ + prevIndex: -2, ... - const close = () => { - state.prevIdex = -2 + const close = () => { + state.prevIndex = -2 ... - state.prevIdex = index + state.prevIndex = index ... In the template bindings: - prev: state.prevIdex - 1 === index + prev: state.prevIndex - 1 === indexAlso applies to: 190-190, 197-197, 225-225, 227-227
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue (2)
Line range hint
244-247
: LGTM: Proper implementation of 'openAIRobot' methodThe
openAIRobot
method is correctly implemented to toggle the visibility of the AI robot component. This enhances user interaction with AI features in the application.
Line range hint
222-238
: Verify that plugins with a 'confirm' property have corresponding methodsIn the updated
clickMenu
function, when switching plugins, it checks if the last plugin has aconfirm
property and attempts to invoke it viapluginRef.value?.[lastPlugin.confirm](confirmCallback)
. To prevent runtime errors, ensure that all plugins with aconfirm
property actually have the corresponding method implemented in their components.Run the following script to verify that all plugins with a
confirm
property have corresponding methods:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/common/component/PluginPanel.vue (2)
Line range hint
143-157
: Add defensive checks for panel ref.Consider adding null checks for the panel ref to handle edge cases gracefully.
Update both mouse down handlers with defensive checks:
const onMouseDownRight = (event) => { changeMoveDragBarState(true) startX = event.clientX - startWidth = panel.value.offsetWidth + startWidth = panel.value?.offsetWidth ?? MIN_WIDTH document.addEventListener('mousemove', throttledMouseMoveRight) document.addEventListener('mouseup', onMouseUpRight) } const onMouseDownLeft = (event) => { changeMoveDragBarState(true) startX = event.clientX - startWidth = panel.value.offsetWidth + startWidth = panel.value?.offsetWidth ?? MIN_WIDTH document.addEventListener('mousemove', throttledMouseMoveLeft) document.addEventListener('mouseup', onMouseUpLeft) }
Line range hint
73-157
: Consider extracting reusable logic into composables.The resize and throttle functionality could be made more reusable:
- Move the throttle function to a shared utility.
- Create a
useResizable
composable to encapsulate the resize logic.This would improve maintainability and reduce duplication if similar functionality is needed elsewhere.
packages/design-core/src/DesignSettings.vue (1)
176-177
: Consider organizing return properties consistently.The
rightMenu
andgetMoveDragBarState
properties appear to be added at the end of the return object. Consider grouping related properties together for better maintainability:
- Refs with other refs
- State-related methods with other state methods
return { state, showMask, + rightMenu, activating, settingsState, components, iconComponents, clickMenu, close, fixPanel, rightFixedPanelsStorage, onEnd, showContextMenu, changeAlign, PLUGIN_POSITION, getPluginShown, switchAlign, - rightMenu, - getMoveDragBarState + getMoveDragBarState }packages/controller/src/useLayout.js (1)
86-91
: Consider enhancing the new state management functions.The functions would benefit from the following improvements:
- Add JSDoc documentation to describe the purpose and parameters.
- Add type checking for the state parameter.
- Consider following the existing pattern of using
change
prefix consistently (e.g.,changeMoveDragBar
).Apply these improvements:
+/** + * Get the current state of the move drag bar + * @returns {boolean} The current state + */ -const getMoveDragBarState = () => { - return layoutState.isMoveDragBar -} +const getMoveDragBarState = () => layoutState.isMoveDragBar +/** + * Change the state of the move drag bar + * @param {boolean} state - The new state + */ const changeMoveDragBarState = (state) => { + if (typeof state !== 'boolean') { + throw new TypeError('State must be a boolean') + } layoutState.isMoveDragBar = state }packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue (3)
107-107
: Consider using a more semantic class name.The class name
not-selected
doesn't clearly convey its purpose of preventing text selection during drag operations. Consider using a more descriptive name likeprevent-selection
ordrag-in-progress
.
169-169
: TODO comment needs more context.The TODO comment "后续优化" (subsequent optimization) is too vague. Please provide specific details about what needs to be optimized and why.
Line range hint
169-176
: Consider extracting AI robot functionality into a separate component.The current implementation tightly couples the AI robot functionality with the plugin navigation panel. Consider:
- Extracting the AI robot-related code (robotVisible, robotComponent, openAIRobot) into a separate component
- Using a state management solution (e.g., Vuex/Pinia) to handle the robot's visibility state
- Creating a dedicated service for AI-related operations
This would improve:
- Code organization
- Component reusability
- Maintenance
- Testing
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/common/component/PluginPanel.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/controller/src/useLayout.js (3 hunks)
- packages/design-core/src/DesignCanvas.vue (5 hunks)
- packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue (5 hunks)
- packages/design-core/src/DesignSettings.vue (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
packages/common/component/PluginPanel.vue (3)
73-73
: LGTM: Clean addition of drag state management.The addition of
changeMoveDragBarState
to the destructured methods is well-organized and follows the component's existing patterns.
132-132
: LGTM: Consistent drag state cleanup.The drag state is properly reset when the resize operation ends.
Also applies to: 138-138
144-144
: LGTM: Consistent drag state initialization.The drag state is properly set when the resize operation begins.
Also applies to: 152-152
packages/design-core/src/DesignCanvas.vue (3)
3-8
: LGTM: Clean implementation of drag state handling.The class binding effectively manages user interactions during drag operations.
226-229
: LGTM: Appropriate CSS properties for interaction blocking.The CSS implementation effectively disables user interactions during drag operations.
60-60
: Verify drag state implementation across components.Let's ensure the drag state functionality is consistently implemented across related components.
Also applies to: 202-203
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the drag state implementation.
The previous results showed that
getMoveDragBarState
exists inuseLayout.js
and thenot-selected
class is used across multiple Design components. Let's get more context about their implementation and interaction to verify the consistency of the drag state functionality.
Based on the results, I can now provide a final verification response:
Drag state implementation is correctly synchronized across components
The verification shows that the drag state functionality is consistently implemented:
getMoveDragBarState
is properly imported fromuseLayout
and used consistently inDesignCanvas
,DesignSettings
, andDesignPlugins
components- All components apply the
not-selected
class based on the same drag state condition- The drag state is centrally managed in
useLayout.js
with proper getter (getMoveDragBarState
) and setter (changeMoveDragBarState
) functions- The
not-selected
class consistently appliesuser-select: none
across components, withpointer-events: none
where needed🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent implementation of drag state functionality # Test 1: Check for getMoveDragBarState usage echo "Checking getMoveDragBarState usage across components..." ast-grep --pattern 'getMoveDragBarState' # Test 2: Check for not-selected class usage echo "Checking not-selected class usage..." rg -l "not-selected" # Test 3: Check for related drag state management echo "Checking related drag state management..." rg -l "useLayout.*dragBar"Length of output: 681
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation details of getMoveDragBarState and its usage echo "Checking getMoveDragBarState implementation:" rg -A 5 "getMoveDragBarState" echo -e "\nChecking drag state related code in Vue components:" rg -A 5 "dragBar|not-selected" packages/design-core/src/Design*.vue echo -e "\nChecking useLayout implementation related to drag:" rg -A 5 "dragBar|setDragBar" packages/controller/src/useLayout.jsLength of output: 7027
packages/design-core/src/DesignSettings.vue (2)
4-4
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the missing CSS class definition.
The
not-selected
class is dynamically added but there's no corresponding CSS definition in the style section. This might result in the class having no visual effect during drag operations.Consider adding the CSS definition for the
not-selected
class:<style lang="less" scoped> + .not-selected { + // Add your styles here, e.g.: + opacity: 0.5; + pointer-events: none; + } #tiny-engine-right-panel { // existing styles... } </style>
86-86
: Verify the drag bar state implementation.The
getMoveDragBarState
method is imported but its implementation details are not visible in this file. Please ensure that:
- The method's behavior is documented
- It correctly handles all drag states
- It's tested for edge cases
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to get more context about the implementation.
From the initial results, I found that:
- The implementation exists in
packages/controller/src/useLayout.js
- It's a simple getter that returns
layoutState.isMoveDragBar
- There's also a setter
changeMoveDragBarState
- The method is used in multiple Vue components to conditionally apply a 'not-selected' class
I need to verify:
- How the
layoutState
is initialized- Where and how
changeMoveDragBarState
is used- The complete context of the drag bar state management
This will help me provide a comprehensive verification of the implementation.
I now have enough information to provide the final verification response based on the implementation details found.
The drag bar state implementation is correctly implemented and used
The
getMoveDragBarState
implementation is straightforward and well-integrated:
- It's a simple getter that returns a boolean state from a reactive
layoutState
object- The state is properly initialized as
false
by default- The state is toggled via
changeMoveDragBarState
during panel resizing operations- It's used consistently across components to apply a 'not-selected' class during drag operations
Usage pattern in
PluginPanel.vue
shows proper state management:
- State is set to
true
when drag starts (mousedown)- State is reset to
false
when drag ends (mouseup)- Proper cleanup of event listeners is performed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation and tests of getMoveDragBarState echo "Searching for implementation..." rg -A 5 "getMoveDragBarState" echo "Searching for tests..." fd -e spec.js -e test.js | xargs rg "getMoveDragBarState"Length of output: 4602
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the layoutState definition and its usage echo "Searching for layoutState..." rg -A 5 "layoutState\s*=\s*" packages/controller/src/useLayout.js # Search for isMoveDragBar usage echo "Searching for isMoveDragBar usage..." rg "isMoveDragBar" packages/controller/src/ # Search for changeMoveDragBarState usage echo "Searching for changeMoveDragBarState usage..." rg -A 3 "changeMoveDragBarState"Length of output: 2982
packages/controller/src/useLayout.js (3)
54-54
: LGTM: Clear and well-placed state property.The new reactive state property follows proper naming conventions and is appropriately initialized.
322-324
: LGTM: Proper export of new functionality.The new functions are correctly exposed and maintain the existing export pattern.
54-54
: Verify the integration with consuming components.Let's verify the usage of these new functions in the components mentioned in the AI summary.
Also applies to: 86-91
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to search for these functions without relying on file type filtering.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Integration verified - drag bar state is properly managed
The search results confirm proper integration of the drag bar state:
- The
isMoveDragBar
state is correctly defined inuseLayout.js
and accessed through getter/setter functions- The state is used by multiple components:
packages/design-core/src/DesignSettings.vue
packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue
packages/design-core/src/DesignCanvas.vue
packages/common/component/PluginPanel.vue
The state management is consistent, with no direct access to
isMoveDragBar
found in Vue components - they properly use the getter/setter functions instead.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of the new drag bar state functions # Test 1: Find components using getMoveDragBarState echo "Components using getMoveDragBarState:" rg "getMoveDragBarState" --type vue # Test 2: Find components using changeMoveDragBarState echo "\nComponents using changeMoveDragBarState:" rg "changeMoveDragBarState" --type vue # Test 3: Check for any potential direct access to isMoveDragBar echo "\nDirect access to isMoveDragBar (should use getter/setter instead):" rg "isMoveDragBar" --type vueLength of output: 515
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of drag bar state functions across all files # Test 1: Find files using getMoveDragBarState echo "Files using getMoveDragBarState:" rg "getMoveDragBarState" -l # Test 2: Find files using changeMoveDragBarState echo -e "\nFiles using changeMoveDragBarState:" rg "changeMoveDragBarState" -l # Test 3: Find usage context of isMoveDragBar echo -e "\nContext of isMoveDragBar usage:" rg "isMoveDragBar" -C 2 # Test 4: List all .vue files to verify if they exist echo -e "\nVue files in the repository:" fd ".*\.vue$"Length of output: 16251
packages/design-core/src/DesignPlugins.vue (1)
188-189
: Verify the drag state management implementation.The
getMoveDragBarState
method is used for preventing text selection during drag operations. Let's verify its implementation and usage across components.✅ Verification successful
Let me try another script to find the implementation with a corrected regex pattern.
Let me try one more time without specifying file types.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the drag state management implementation.
The drag state management implementation is properly structured and used correctly
The verification shows that:
getMoveDragBarState
is implemented inpackages/controller/src/useLayout.js
and simply returnslayoutState.isMoveDragBar
- It's correctly used in three components (
DesignPlugins.vue
,DesignSettings.vue
, andDesignCanvas.vue
) to apply a 'not-selected' class during drag operations- The drag state management is part of a larger, well-structured system:
- The state is managed through the
useLayout
composable- It works in conjunction with
changeMoveDragBarState
to toggle the drag state- The implementation prevents text selection during drag operations as intended
The code follows Vue.js best practices for state management and component interaction.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of getMoveDragBarState # Expected: Find the implementation in useLayout.js and its usage in other components # Check the implementation echo "Checking implementation in useLayout.js:" rg "getMoveDragBarState.*=.*{" -A 5 # Check usage in other components echo "\nChecking usage in components:" rg "getMoveDragBarState\(\)"Length of output: 650
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation with a corrected pattern echo "Searching for getMoveDragBarState implementation:" rg "getMoveDragBarState" -A 5 --type vue --type js --type ts # Search for any drag state related variables or methods echo -e "\nSearching for drag state related code:" rg "dragState|isDragging" -A 3 --type vue --type js --type tsLength of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation echo "Searching for getMoveDragBarState implementation:" rg "getMoveDragBarState" -A 5 # Search for any drag state related code echo -e "\nSearching for drag state related code:" rg "dragState|isDragging|moveDragBar" -A 3Length of output: 14158
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
后续优化
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Refactor