Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disclaimer about router terminology on node-roles-and-types.md #160

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rochaferraz
Copy link

Routers are now officially named "Thread Mesh Extenders" on all consumer facing comms. Adding this information here.

Q: should we update all documentation to reflect the name change or can we still use "router" in engineering docs and primers?

Routers are now officially named "Thread Mesh Extenders" on all consumer facing comms. Adding this information here.

Q: should we update *all* documentation to reflect the name change or can we still use "router" in engineering docs and primers?
@Vyrastas
Copy link
Member

Vyrastas commented Jun 7, 2024

Sorry, I missed this. @jwhui is this a change we should make in the OpenThread docs?

@jwhui
Copy link
Member

jwhui commented Jun 10, 2024

Sorry, I missed this. @jwhui is this a change we should make in the OpenThread docs?

Yes, we should put something to this effect. "Mesh Extenders" is the name Thread Group recommends for consumer-facing documentation. But "Routers" is still used by the Thread Specification.

@Vyrastas
Copy link
Member

Yeah I would just change it a few places for now, these docs are not really for consumers. I haven't looked at the Primer material in a while, I'll have to see other places where it makes sense to change and also mention Mesh Extenders.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants