Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restoring expansion in interface scripts #965

Conversation

jpodivin
Copy link
Contributor

@jpodivin jpodivin commented Dec 5, 2024

It's generally better to see scripts expanded. Both scripts were committed with the option commented out, I assume this was an oversight.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from karelyatin and viroel December 5, 2024 09:25
@jpodivin jpodivin force-pushed the expansionrestoration branch from 51d10e7 to c2c7c95 Compare December 5, 2024 10:51
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fao89, jpodivin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Dec 9, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5a4d9bc into openstack-k8s-operators:main Dec 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@jpodivin jpodivin deleted the expansionrestoration branch December 9, 2024 13:19
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/bash
# set -x
set -x
Copy link
Contributor

@bogdando bogdando Dec 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

creds and KUBEADMIN_PWD should not be echoed

however, this is a nit as we do not use real passwords in dev setups, and those scripts should never be used outside of devsetups

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants