Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add empty list as default for adoption scenarios without networker nodes #2581

Conversation

ciecierski
Copy link
Contributor

Networker nodes are not required in all adoption topologies.
We need to provide default filter to be able to generate adoption_vars
template if osp-networkers are not defined in _vm_groups.

Fixes: #2548

Networker nodes are not required in all adoption topologies.
We need to provide default filter to be able to generate adoption_vars
template if osp-networkers are not defined in _vm_groups.

Fixes: openstack-k8s-operators#2548
@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft December 3, 2024 11:35
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Thanks for the PR! ❤️
I'm marking it as a draft, once your happy with it merging and the PR is passing CI, click the "Ready for review" button below.

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/567f9d05177d4dcf98be90f49f7dec81

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 31m 01s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 19m 35s
cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal RETRY_LIMIT in 13m 47s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 7m 37s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 7m 47s
✔️ build-push-container-cifmw-client SUCCESS in 22m 14s

Copy link
Contributor

@hjensas hjensas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@hjensas
Copy link
Contributor

hjensas commented Dec 3, 2024

recheck

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/b63f1b0ee79f4b1aa08be59c0f2cb158

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 36m 31s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 19m 48s
cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal FAILURE in 54m 07s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 7m 57s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 8m 23s
✔️ build-push-container-cifmw-client SUCCESS in 37m 02s

@hjensas
Copy link
Contributor

hjensas commented Dec 4, 2024

recheck

@hjensas
Copy link
Contributor

hjensas commented Dec 4, 2024

The previous run's have failed applying NNCP. This install_yaml's make target - https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/install_yamls/blob/main/Makefile#L2270-L2273

@pablintino
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Dec 4, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 79a60e4 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Dec 4, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants